Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

From Wikipedia:

For example, introns are extremely common within the nuclear genome of higher vertebrates (e.g. humans and mice), where protein-coding genes almost always contain multiple introns, while introns are rare within the nuclear genes of some eukaryotic microorganisms,[8] for example baker's/brewer's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In contrast, the mitochondrial genomes of vertebrates are entirely devoid of introns, while those of eukaryotic microorganisms may contain many introns. Introns are well known in bacterial and archaeal genes, but occur more rarely than in most eukaryotic genomes.

In my biochemistry course we learned that bacteria have no introns and eukaryots nearly always have them. What's correct?

Do viruses have introns as the Wikipedia article claims?

share|improve this question
    
I think your biochemistry course is correct! An example of a eukaryotic organism without introns is the trypanosome (the cause of sleeping sickness). I suppose the lesson is 'Don't believe everything you read in Wikipedia' :). –  TomD Sep 28 '13 at 14:33
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

As a general rule, a blanket statement in Biology should always be considered false.

It so happens that bacteria do have 'introns' (or at least the intron genomic sequence has been determined) in the sense of the cis-acting autocatalytic Group I and II introns. These are sequences of RNA that adopt such a conformation to catalyze their own excision from an mRNA transcript, and thus may be considered ribozymes, enzyme made of ribonucleic acid.

Although not generally considered 'introns' segments of RNA are removed during the course of tRNA in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Now introns that are removed by the action of the spliceosome are strictly found in eukaryotes, as bacteria lack the spliceosome.

There seem to be a considerable number of papers regarding the question of intron (particularly spliceosomal) phylogeny that should be relatively easy to find if you are so interested.

One example paper in which viral introns (Group I) are reported: http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/13/2532.abstract

share|improve this answer
    
As a general rule, a blanket statement in Biology should always be considered false. I could not agree more. –  Amory Sep 28 '13 at 23:59
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.