Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I admit I'm not very learned on the subject of evolution, I just started researching it for myself about a week ago. One of the things that I don't understand is why humans and almost every other animal/bug/fish etc. on earth has a symmetrical body. What advantage does this have for the survival of the fittest? It must be quite important, since it re-occurs so frequently and early in the evolutionary family tree.

share|improve this question
Related Question:… – Rory M Oct 14 '13 at 15:59
Only Bilateria ( are bilaterally symmetric like humans. Millions (billions?) of other eukaryotes and prokaryotes (by whatever names they are going these days) are not symmetric. – kmm Oct 14 '13 at 16:20
still a fair question - perhaps change to: "why are humans and most animalia phyla symmetric - bilateal?" – shigeta Oct 14 '13 at 17:32
This is not a duplicate, the other question is about lack of internal symmetry, not the evolution of symmetry in general. – terdon Oct 14 '13 at 21:32
@kmm.. there are others that are radially symmetric too.. some unicellular organisms also have an axis of symmetry.. – WYSIWYG Oct 15 '13 at 4:17

[If we are talking about animals, there is a number of types of body symmetry: asymmetry, radial, bilateral, spiral, rotational, glide and metameric symmetries. Bilateral and radial are the two basic types, which served as main classificatory character for animal mega-systematics in the past.]

It's assumed that body symmetry is associated with general environmental gradients.

Animals with (elements of) radial symmetry have one dorso-ventral axis which echos only one environmental gradient: substrate/water column, depth etc. Besides this polarity, resources/signals/danger may come from any direction. Imagine a Hydra polyp with its foot attached to a waterweed and its tentacles surrounding the mouth on the opposite end and expecting the victim to come from any side.

Body of bilateral animals possesses the same dorso-ventral axis and yet another polarity, orthogonal to it: the anterior-posterior axis. This axis is conjugated with the gradient created by locomotion: the anterior margin of the body is likely to encounter something new first. This principle lies in the basis of cephalization: most bilaterial animals have more or less shaped "head".

Evolutionary changes in body symmetry are thus thought to be associated with changes in life-style, e.g.:

  • there is a hypothesis that cnidarians were originally bilateral (and many of them still show some degree bilaterality), but lost it after becoming sedentary.
  • non-walkers echinoderms originated from fully bilateral animals and later acquired their famed pentameric radial symmetry (were they originally fully sedentary like modern stalked sea lilies?). This symmetry, however was again distorted towards secondary bilaterality (not matching the original plane of symmetry) in endobenthic forms: sand dollars and some holothurians.
  • worms like nematodes or priapulids are dwellers of viscous media, similar in all directions: dorso-ventral gradient of environment in this case is absent or weak. Though the original bilateral symmetry is very clear in their body plans, signs of radial symmetry prevail in some organ systems, including the general vermiform appearance. Thus, nematodes combine triradial (head sensilla, pharynx), biradial (musculature) and bilateral (nervous system, genitalia, tail) symmetries.
share|improve this answer

Symmetry is like data compression, it diminishes amount of information needed to build an organism.

share|improve this answer
Can you give some additional context for you answer? – kmm Oct 17 '13 at 14:21
What he means is, you don't need separate info for each piece (arm, leg, tentacle, eye, etc.). The DNA only needs to store the info for one, plus the info needed to "symmetrize" it. – dmm Oct 18 '13 at 16:22
good point actually. – WYSIWYG Oct 24 '13 at 11:15
There comes information theory. – dexterdev May 26 '15 at 6:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.