Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am working on mathematically modeling HIV and Tuberculosis Co-infection dynamics, and am working with 12 differential equations describing the behavior of all of the compartments and parameters.

Anyway, I just have one question:

Which is harder, in general: For a susceptible person to contract HIV, or a HIV+ person to contract AIDS?

Please pardon my ignorance.


share|improve this question
infection rate constant is much higher than disease progression constant. The rates will depend on how many infected individuals are present and how much are they interacting.. – WYSIWYG Nov 1 '13 at 7:15
This is rather broad... – Amory Nov 1 '13 at 13:24
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Your question depends hugely on the factors at play.

  • The rate of transmission depends on the route of infection. Wikipedia has a good breakdown showing the wide variability. Are they getting a blood transfusion? 90%. Mother-to-infant? 25%. Male-to-female vaginal sex? No higher than 0.3%. Not to mention that the incidence varies massively between countries, as does the most common route of infection.
  • The rate of progression to AIDS also depends on a large number of factors including age, viral load, various genotypes, access to medical treatment, and, of course, long-term nonprogressor (LTNP) status.

The incidence of LTNPs is around 1 in 500, or 0.2%, which overlaps with but is at the low end of transmission rates for some routes of infection.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.