Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In a separate question I've described my general experimental setup where I need to measure the number of live cells in a growing bacterial culture in a fairly rapid and high-throughput manner. In that question I'm asking if there are any alternatives to the gold standard of CFU plating for making this measurement. As I wrote that question, it occurred to me that if I could just make CFU plating easier to do with lots of samples (esp. using fewer plates), then this method could work just as well. So my question here is if there is a way to make CFU serial dilution plating easier when I have to measure the number of live cells in 7+ different growth conditions every hour of growth?


share|improve this question
see my answer on your previous question - I'm not sure you'll be able to get much more high-throughput than that :) – MattDMo Nov 16 '13 at 20:06
Thanks, @MattDMo. I agree that the Cedex machine is more high-throughput, but I am looking for any neat tricks people have tried to make CFU plating more economical. For example, one idea would be to put agar in each well of a [12 well plate][1] and do 12 samples at a time; then the question would be if people have tried this and the reduction in available area for counting made the CFU counting significantly less reliable. Or something like that. [1]… – A. Kennard Nov 17 '13 at 17:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.