Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is tactile perception two-dimensional or three-dimensional? Can tactile sense be mapped on 2-dimensional map of the surface of the human body or does human receive tactile signal as a 3D position (owing that internal organs can also feel pain)?

share|improve this question

It's not 2D: Tactile perception can very simply understand a ring around your finger. If you projected the skin of your body onto a 2D plane there would be a way to represent this sensation, but only as an irregular shape. So you need a third dimension to cognitively process this sensation.

But Phantom pain tells us the brain doesn't always register tactile perception from a true 3D mapping. For example a person without an arm could feel pain in a finger that doesn't exist. Not always, but sometimes.

So it's greater than two, and sometimes three doesn't fully describe the known phenomena. Therefore it's (at least) 4-D.

share|improve this answer
Hmmm I don't get how phantom pain affects the number of dimensions. – Anixx Jul 8 '14 at 0:43

Well, vision is 2D * 2 (two retinae) but visual perception is 3D, auditory signal is 1D * 2 (two ears), but its perception is 3D. The 3D perception in these senses are results of analysis of the lower dimensional sensory signal combined with various other internal states. (Internal states can integrate information over time to produce better percepts.)

Likewise, each tactile sensor is a point source, but the percept of the total tactile sensory stimuli is 3D; I can tell where the source of the sense is in 3D space relative to my body position. The signals will have to be combined with the proprioception and state information in the brain to do so.

Note that these 3D percepts don't always work perfectly. Sometimes we form the wrong percept or fail to get a percept.

share|improve this answer
Sorry, but you cannot hear in 3D using 2 ears in any case. It is mathematically impossible. – Anixx Apr 7 '14 at 21:58
@Anixx but you can. Head transfer function and prior knowledge. It's mathematically possible, although not always the case. – Memming Apr 8 '14 at 13:00
@Anixx combined with other cues, not perfectly, but possible. – Memming Apr 8 '14 at 13:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.