Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Standard models in population genetics look up at the evolution of few loci which impact fitness. The variance in fitness is determined by the genetic variance and the environmental variance (and the co-variance between environment and genetics). In this question I am interested only about genetic variance and about what percentage of the total genetic variance in fitness do $n$ loci explain.

In nature, globally speaking,

  • how much of the fitness variance does the most important locus explain?
  • How much of the fitness variance do the 3 most important loci explain?
  • How much of the fitness variance do the 100 most important loci explain? … or if you prefer…
  • How many loci explain 50%, 80%, 99% of the total genetic variance in fitness?

It is obvious that the answer depends on the population under consideration. Factors that might influence the answers are for example

  • species
  • population size
  • environment stability

I am seeking for answers based on empirical work that provide such insights in populations of any lineage (bacteria, yeast, animals, plants, whatever…).

Beside this question, I also welcome some insights concerning how different factors are likely to influence the answer.

share|improve this question
Do you have at least one example of an empirical study of the type you are looking for ? It may be a helpful starting point for us in finding other ones. –  Barbara Feb 10 at 13:16
No, unfortunately I don't know any empirical study that investigates my question. –  Remi.b Feb 10 at 14:25
And do you have any study, which measures percentual increase in fitness, regardless of the cause ? –  Barbara Feb 10 at 14:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.