Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I built trees (for 4 organisms: mouse, human, drosophila and C-elegans) for different enzymes family, compared them to the conventional tree, and try to explain them.

how would you explain these result:

for the Oxidoreductases family - most of the tree are quite similar to the conventional tree.

for the Transferases family - in many trees the human is very close to the mouse

for the Hydrolases family - in many trees drosophila split from the others (instead of C-elegans), and in some the human split from the others.

thanks.

share|improve this question
    
On which basis is the "conventional" tree build? –  Chris Feb 21 at 9:43
    
comparing to the "tree of life" –  user5790 Feb 21 at 10:03
    
But this tree of life must be based on some comparision as well. –  Chris Feb 21 at 10:17
    
based on completely sequenced genomes –  user5790 Feb 21 at 10:19
1  
Sorry, but I doubt that. There are by far more species on these trees than we have sequenced today. –  Chris Feb 21 at 10:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.