Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

From this article, first page, middle of the second column:

Even if harmful alleles do not become fixed, they can still reduce the efficacy of selection on neighbouring loci through a process called Hill–Robertson interference. This effect occurs because individuals bearing deleterious mutations are less likely to survive and reproduce, reducing the number of individuals that contribute genetically to the future population. This reduces the effective population size witnessed by a focal locus

I don't understand the link between the Hill-Robertson effects and the effective population size. Why would the effective population size be greater in absence of Hill-Robertson effects? Can you please make this link clear to me?


Here is another question on the same article.

share|improve this question
    
your name changed, I preferred Remi.b because I am not sure how to cite a name with a space! –  hello_there_andy Apr 1 at 13:43
1  
@hello_there_andy Ha ha you're a funny dude! But thanks for noticing, I didn't change my "display name" on purpose; Mac's auto-filling made it for me! I just wanted to add my "real name". I'm Remi.b again! Thanks for your answer below. –  Remi.b Apr 1 at 13:48
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted
+50

Hopefully this syllogism will answer your question.

Given the following premises:

  1. In the absence of selection, fitness of individuals are at a theoretical maximum.
  2. If a theoretical maximum fitness is achieved then effective population size is maximum.
  3. If there is an allele that confers both increased and decreased fitness you have a genetic conflict (e.g. an allele that turns you green gives you good woodland camouflage but is un-attractive).
  4. If a deleterious allele is linked to a beneficial allele this is similar to having a genetic conflict.

The conclusion follows:

Strong linkage between beneficial alleles and deleterious alleles (Hill Robertson effects, i.e. 3. and 4.) prevents a theoretically maximum fitness to be attained (1.) and thus a reduced effective population size (2.). Which can only be overcome by high levels of recombination and mating (i.e. by separating deleterious and beneficial alleles).

share|improve this answer
1  
I don't want to repeat the same thing every time you answer my questions (this happened twice I think) but really: As soon as I start reading your answer I realize how obvious was the answer and feel stupid I didn't get it before. Thanks for your help. –  Remi.b Apr 1 at 14:06
    
No no please don't feel that way!! Funny because I felt the same way when being taught these things by my research supervisor, Prof. Burt (who's worked closely with "R" as you call him). The only stupid thing to do is lacking bravery to ask the questions. –  hello_there_andy Apr 1 at 14:10
1  
Who is "R" (as I call him)? Robert Trivers? –  Remi.b Apr 1 at 14:15
    
ah yes, perhaps it wasn't you who called him that oops :P –  hello_there_andy Apr 1 at 14:42
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.