Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to know what's the approximate percentage of understood human DNA, as in, which part does what. I'm not asking for details, just the amount.

Thank you.

share|improve this question

closed as too broad by leonardo, terdon, Ilan, biogirl, WYSIWYG Apr 21 at 10:44

There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
I am not sure if this can be said. Understanding the human genome is a process still going on today. Additionally this field is moving rather fast. –  Chris Apr 16 at 19:23
3  
You would need to define "understanding". This is not a book where we simply have to read the words. Each "word" can have multiple different functions and we can't say with complete certainty that we understand any of them 100%. We have a pretty good idea about a relatively large part of it but understand is a loaded word. –  terdon Apr 16 at 23:13
    
Thank you. So if I understand this, DNA is being deciphered. But, we still can't say for certain that we know what each part exactly mean. Is that correct? –  Wajih Aziza Apr 17 at 0:37
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The devil is in the details, and therefore we cannot just state that we have understood X% of the DNA. We know e.g. that 2% of the human DNA encode proteins. And for a good number of proteins we know what they do. So you might know that a particular codon AGT encodes a serine residue in a protein, which could have a catalytic activity. Or it has a structural activity. Or we are not sure what it does. Sometimes protein-coding and regulatory sequences overlap. So even if we first understood the protein-coding function, there was still the regulatory function to be discovered.

The upshot is that there are multiple levels of understanding, and big controversies of what they actually imply (see e.g. the ENCODE saga).

share|improve this answer
    
Okay, I didn't understand your example but I got what you meant by it. Your answer was satisfactory. Thank you. You also gave me something interesting to read about. –  Wajih Aziza Apr 17 at 9:58
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.