Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Someone claimed that the dinosaurs could only live because back then athmospheric density was around 650 kg/m³, providing some buyoncy, this claim is checked on Skeptics SE. The claim itself is beside the point now. A simple calculation shows us that an atmsphere with this density would be supercritical in underwise normal conditions, the pressure would be increased by a factor of roughly 520. See my answer to the skeptics question for a bit more explanation. I would say that a supercritical air atmosphere rules out life for several reasons:

  • The high effusity of the fluid may mean that cell membranes don't work
  • Proteins fold differently under high pressure, requiring specific adaptions
  • If the partial pressure of oxygen is increased proportionally, the atmosphere is highly toxic
  • If the partial pressure of oxygen remains at current levels, it is a trace gas and reactions relying on oxygen may run into kinetic problems (There may be a sweet spot between the last two issues)

Anyway, those are just my hunches, I never heard of experiments about life in supercritical fluids and I'm no biologist so my hunches may be totally wrong. My question is: Can we rule out life in supercritical fluids; if not can we rule out air breathing, multi cellular animal life?
Or has any life been shown to thrive in a supercritical fluid?

To stress again, the part with buoyant dinosaurs was given for background (and amusement), I'm only asking here to check my hunch that suprecriticality rules out life.

share|improve this question

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.