Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have very limited knowledge of how the human memory works as I think, at this time, most people do. However, I have been reading and some articles which say, and I quote the article just linked

Memories are made by messenger RNA (mRNA) that encode β-actin protein.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong but proteins of any sort have mass. So, why following this rule of proteins being used to create the memory does our brain not grow in mass with each memory we create/ encode. And also, if our memories are encoded using proteins, why can neurodegen­erative (E.g. Alzheimer's) cannot be cured by artificial proteins in the same way we use insulin. I quote again,

memories were merely out of reach

full article Surely this means that, it is possible to, by using artificial proteins or possibly electrical stimuli we could recover memories. Or have I wandered off on a wrong track here? Am I correct? Or are my concepts of memory slightly wrong?

share|improve this question
    
Read about synapses; you'll be clear .. –  WYSIWYG May 15 at 11:46
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

I think its important to mention that the particulars of memory storage in the brain are still being worked out. I think what we do know about it is that memory storage depends a lot on the physical configuration of the neurons in the brain. They move about and make new connections as they process information (and probably also when they are not processing information!). Different regions of the brain store short vs long term memory and different sorts of memories. They neurons themselves have a lot of internal cell physiology that can change as well - there are many different neuroreceptors that constitute the synaptic junctions.

All these things may not be a comprehensive list. But at the basis of all these processes, the cell expresses new proteins in mRNA and these proteins are doing all this work. beta-actin and histone de-acetylase, as mentioned in your link, are responsible for the cell rearranging itself in the cell shape and in terms of its internal transport processes and in the nucleus respectively.

I'm pretty sure that exactly what is happening here is not really well understood. monitoring the interior of the cell is difficult. The work where histone deacetylase is inhibited is a fresh new thought, showing that the arrangement of the chromosomes in the nucleus is involved in hiding memories. Its still the equivalent to getting a stopped watch to start again by shaking it - there are parts there that fell into place and started ticking again, but we don't really know what the parts are doing in any detail yet.

This hints that if you were to disrupt the cells in some ways you might be able to free up memory, but its a long way from guaranteeing that any given approach will work. I'd be surprised even if Dr Tsai's cell treatment worked even 70% of the time in her experiment. Hypnosis or a focused meditation session might still be just as effective. I think that its a bit too much to expect that Alzheimer's memories are completely preserved and recoverable. In some cases probably, but categorical statements rarely hold in bioscience.

Like a lot of neuroscience, this work is suggestive, but still just progress towards a clearer understanding of these processes.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.