Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Most organic structures built from hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and carbon. They are represent 1-,2-,3-,4- bond relations (chemical valence) which allow to build variety of chain structures.

Are there exist some replacements for these elements to create complex structures that theoretically can create life (self-reproduced or be a part of cell as organelle)?


share|improve this question
For the last two references: These are, nicely spoken, highly debated. Its been a while since I read the paper, but as far as I remember they never showed a direct proof that the DNA from these bacteria contains arsenic instead of phosphorus. They can however grow in the presence of high arsenic concentration which is also interesting and impressive. See this article for example. – Chris May 15 '14 at 19:14
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Its not scientifically or logically possible to say 'this is impossible' but since this is a speculative question, I'll hazard an opinion.

I'd like to argue that, at Earth standard pressure temperature and atmospheric conditions, C H O and N are not really replaceable. Throw water into the mix as the most common liquid and replacing any or all of these elements is hard to imagine.

One can think about this by looking at the formation of long hydrocarbon chains. Silicon can form polymers, but they tend to fall apart. Silcone-oxide polymers [SiR2-O-SiR2-O-] are more stable, but do not resemble hydrocarbon polymers as readily.

Carbon is much more versatile, capable of forming either chain, or including sulfur, nitrogen in stable chains that don't seem to really have any length limitations.

At thousands of atmosphere's pressure, temperatures of 70 Kelvin or in a sea of sulfuric acid, its easy to imagine other sorts of chemistry would dominate - phosphate , arsenic chains or germainium lattices, but on Earth most of these would fall apart.

Even if/when life is discovered elsewhere , it will certainly feature chemistry that will completely amaze us; unlike anything here. But even so, its hard for me to imagine it being completely exclusive of these four elements. I just want to point out that by a wide margin, hydrogen is the most common element of the universe. Nearly all the other light elements like C, O and N are the next most common. This is simply because they take fewer nuclear fusion events to create. Hydrogen is pretty useful no matter what chemistry you are looking at. These four are probably going to be there somewhere - most planetary atmospheres have Ammonia, CO2 and methane in them as well - at least as far as we've seen.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for many points! +1 – gavenkoa May 16 '14 at 12:52
glad you enjoyed the answer! – shigeta May 16 '14 at 21:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.