Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is a cliche of freshman biology labs to point out that "every cycle of PCR doubles the DNA, so the yield will be $2^{cycles}$ times the template amount". However, if this were true, 1 ng of template would generate about 35 billion ng after 35 cycles, or 35 grams of DNA. This is clearly absurd and not the case.

Of course, the power-of-2 claim is a gross oversimplification (if anything, it is an upper bound - but even so, a very uninformative one), and in practice, yields will fall far short of it because:

  • Every single duplex of DNA does not denature at each cycle
  • Primers do not bind to every single molecule of DNA at each cycle
  • Not every DNA strand gets bound by a polymerase at every cycle
  • Not every polymerase that binds manages to complete the entire product in time in every cycle
  • The reaction inhibits itself by depleting dNTPs
  • The heat denatures the reaction by degrading enzyme

In fact, cursory examination of qPCR output often follows saturation kinetics:

enter image description here

Mathematical methods for modeling qPCR are obviously well developed.

My question is about ordinary PCR: Is it possible get a reasonable expectation of nanogram yield for an ordinary PCR done in a tabletop cycler, with typical PCR reagents?

For instance, when amplifying from a plasmid, I would like to calculate how many cycles to do, how much template to use, and how much product to load on the agarose gel to ensure that I will be able to clearly distinguish exponential amplification (both primers anneal), linear amplification (only one primer anneals), and no amplification (neither primer can anneal or the reaction did not work).

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

The equation is correct, but there's an additional asymptotic limit to a maximum concentration of product depending on the starting concentration of NTPs, template and primer pairs in solution too.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.