Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the evolutionary explanations for why women are weaker than men (on average), and is this difference adaptive? See figure one here.

I suppose that something puts pressure on men to be stronger than women, but I don't see what it can be. Why the discrepancy between the sexes?

share|improve this question
1  
You should clarify your question, and your reason for asking. I assume that you are asking about a difference in average physical strength of sexes (and evolutionary reasons for this), but the Q can be read in other ways as well. Also, differences in body size/strength between sexes is common in many animals (see Sexual dimorphism), and this is usually not to "dominate women" but often (when males are larger/stronger) used in male-male competition. –  fileunderwater Jul 2 at 22:43
5  
For the record, I don't think the Q should be closed as opinion-based. As currently stated, I find it unclear with poor background, but there is a relevant Q on the evolution of sexual differences in humans hiding in there. –  fileunderwater Jul 3 at 13:28
2  
I agree. this site is so steeped in the jargon of biology that it can't handle questions from the public. [reopen] The term they need to hear is 'sexual selection' which was broadly discussed by Darwin. Its not entirely incumbent upon the question if the readers misunderstand. Men and women are clear terms that specify human males and females. Fairly precise. –  shigeta Jul 3 at 17:04

1 Answer 1

What are the evolutionary explanations for why women are weaker than men (on average), and is this difference adaptive?

All of the theories surrounding this fact are speculative; it would be difficult to prove "why" men are, on average, stronger than women.

One contributing theory is Female-Choice - basically that women had (or has) the ability to be more selective when it comes to choosing a mate. Over time men will reflect the preferences of women (taller than them, stronger than them, facial hair qualities, etc.). This is superficially supported by casual studies like the linked one where the "attractiveness" curve for men is down-shifted, meaning women think the average man looks below average in attractiveness and implying those who are viewed as average ( actually the top 20% of men or so) would have better reproductive success. Men, in the same casual study, had a nearly perfect bell-curve associated the attractiveness of women, implying that men are excellent at deducing whether a women is below average in attractiveness, average, or above average in attractiveness.

Another contributing theory is Male-Male Competition. Basically men, at some point (and still might) compete with other men to win over women. The bigger, stronger man would presumably win in a fight and eliminate his competition - directly preventing the production of offspring by the weaker male. The male-male competition also holds true in a more speculative theory in that the winners of wars literally raped their way to reproductive success.

It is worth noting that men, on average, are only about 30-40% stronger than women due to the larger muscle fibers in men (as cross-sectional area determines muscle strength, not volume). With training the difference (kg for kg) is reduced to 15-20%.

Ultimately why women are weaker than men (or men are stronger than women - whichever way you prefer to put it) doesn't have a solid answer beyond "because the stronger, taller men have reproduced".

share|improve this answer
    
I find your first subanswer somewhat vague. The Q is probably asking if there are evolutionary reasons why men are on average psysically stronger than women (see Sex differences in human physiology#strength). How strong we are in comparison to other animals isn't really relevant for this question. However, sex differences in species closely related to us is interesting to understand our evolutionary history. –  fileunderwater Jul 3 at 13:34
    
This answer is not on topic. I didn't asked why men + women are weaker than other animals. And it didn't enter the subquestion of why aren't women stronger than men, so they could "To protect themselves and their family. To hunt for themselves and their family." –  Quora Feans Jul 4 at 9:38
    
@QuoraFeans - You asked why women were weaker than men. The honest answer is that men only have more capacity for strength and potential for muscle mass - but most men will never use it, and it's cultural for women to want to be thin (which might be a minor influence of male-choice selection) - but both women and men are capable of being strong with training. If you're that unhappy with the answer, ask again with more specifics and I will try to answer again. –  MCM Jul 4 at 13:28
    
Saying 'men have more capacity for strength', 'men never use it' is not relevant either. It still does not explain why both genders diverged, and men diverged to be stronger. –  Quora Feans Jul 4 at 14:39
    
@QuoraFeans - Then ask your question again, and be more precise. You're asking why the genders diverged in capacity for muscle development, and I answered that the theories involve Female-Selection for stronger men and that men acted as the defenders/hunters. What type of answer are you looking for? –  MCM Jul 4 at 17:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.