Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose protein A is present in a protein complex ABC. Is it possible that protein A is actually is not important for the function of protein complex ABC? Or put alternatively, can a protein X not present in ABC, yet important for the function for protein complex ABC?

share|improve this question

closed as too broad by Chris, WYSIWYG, Cornelius, GriffinEvo, MattDMo Dec 14 at 18:56

There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
If a protein is part of a complex than it has usually an important function (otherwise it wouldn't be there). It is possible that some complexes still work when some parts are missing, but most likely not as good as they would do when they are complete. –  Chris Jul 10 at 7:10
    
tubulin is a structural protein and can be found unspecifically bound to a protein complex, when a binding site can not be found but thats mostly an experimentally observed (immunoprecipitation) unspecific binding and might/likely not happen in cells so most people ignore this as unspecific binding unless there is good controlled experiments. Co-factors and inhibitors tend to be important in protein complexes as they get involved in feedback mechanisms after a protein complex is formed, which is kind of similar to the second part of your question. –  Bez Jul 10 at 19:01
    
@Bez So protein X can be a cofactors or inhibitors? –  user677101 Jul 13 at 17:56
    
@Chris: According to your explanation if a protein is present in a complex then it must have some function. –  user677101 Jul 13 at 17:57

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.