Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


In all eutherian (mammals excluding the marsupials), the female (who is $XX$ for the pair of sexual chromosomes) inactivates one of her $X$. This is called dosage compensation. This inactivation occurs at a given time during the development when randomly one $X$ is silenced. The daughters of this cell inherit the $X$-inactivation pattern epigenetically, which results in some part of a tissue having the maternal $X$ inactivated while others having the paternal $X$ inactivated (daughters of some other cell which silenced the paternal $X$). This process yield to the famous turtoiseshell coat in female cats.


In short

Assuming X-inactivation occurred in the lineage of the oogonia/oocytes, when does the X-inactivation and X-reactivation occur in the lineage of the oocytes?

A bit developed

Are the X inactivated as well in primary oocytes? If not, is the $X$ inactivated in the secondary oocytes in a primary follicle? If not, did the diploid mother cells of the secondary oocytes have one $X$-inactivated? If yes, did all diploid mother cells of oocytes have the same $X$ inactivated (inactivation occurred relatively early in the development or is there an imprinting) or did the mother cells of oocytes differ in the $X$ they have inactivated (inactivation occurred relatively late in the development)

share|improve this question
I'll post an elaborate answer in some time. Little occupied now – WYSIWYG Aug 6 '14 at 16:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.