Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am wondering if you were theoretically able to get vaccinations or antibodies for any and every diseases and/or illness, would there be a limit to how many you can get and keep in your body at one time? If so, what is the limiting factor?

What would be the possible effects of this on the body and immune system? Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
Everyone has an estimated number of around 10^12 (1 trillion) different antibodies, without counting any immune reaction to vaccines or other antigens (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26860). –  Mad Scientist May 20 '12 at 7:58
    
Textbooks tend to quote different numbers whatever you read, our recommended one (garlandscience.com/product/isbn/9780815341468) comes up to 10^16 for example. But the number itself isn't useful anyway, the point is that it's a lot. –  Armatus May 20 '12 at 9:00
add comment

1 Answer

Antibodies are simply proteins and like any other protein have a relatively short "life", so after clearing out an infection, they are not retained for long (most of them anyway). What the body keeps is memory cells which can produce a much more rapid response if they come in contact with the same pathogen again.

You could see it as a selective process: the body produces immune cells, one or more specific cells for nearly every potential antigen that might exist in the world (there are more steps involved of course but they are of little relevance here). Only those which are used at some point mature into memory cells.

Unfortunately, I just realised that I can't explain why the immune system goes through this selective process; producing cells equivalent to memory cells in the first place would make the immune response much stronger. One explanation I can think of for why the body produces naive cells first is that either a) their production or b) their maintenance is less costly.

The other explanation I could think of is that even immune cells in the periphery which have undergone the proofing mechanisms of immune cell development already, may not be perfect and target body cells every now and then - in that case it would be devastating if they would go all-out like a memory cell.

From my three explanations, only alternative b) would mean there could be a limitation to how many vaccinations our immune system can bear (if memory cells take more effort to maintain than naive cells, having too many of them may overstrain whatever systems maintain them). Otherwise I don't see any limiting factor for how many memory cells you can retain; except if their numbers become so large that your lymph nodes swell and that causes problems.

Edit note: I'm not aware of any research about that question and couldn't find anything either.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.