Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Which are the factors that modify the overall gene differential expression by introducing a vector for single-gene overexpression?

If you overexpress a gene for a protein involved in signal transduction (e.g., a kinase, scaffold, or receptor) by vector cell transfection, then you overdrive the cell using this signaling pathway, it's useful to isolate the pathway and study them.

Is there any way to modify the overall gene expression or cell differential expression pattern by gene transfection? I think this would work if you delivered a gene for overexpression in proteins involved for RNA processing (e.g., splicing, ribosomal proteins, etc.), RNA transcription (e.g., TFs) or protein translation.

share|improve this question
    
This sound like all of genetics. –  bobthejoe Jun 5 '12 at 19:52
    
Looks very similar to Metabolic Engineering –  Noam N. Kremen Jun 6 '12 at 11:18
    
Single protein over expression, was the main strategy to get information about protein function. I do my research in signal transduction, and we use this method. but this is the trick question, every member in our lab get in seminars. –  friveroll Jun 7 '12 at 3:16
add comment

2 Answers 2

Which are the factors that modify the overall gene differential expression by introducing a vector for single-gene overexpression

This is a very relevant question and the field of experimental biology needs to revisit the experimental strategies.

One of the explanations that you gave is correct- that the overexpressed protein might override the cellular processes.

Another problem that this practice gives rise to is incorrect inference. We are mostly interested in knowing what a protein does in a cell at general physiological conditions. If the stoichiometry is altered wrong results will definitely pop up. For example in the case of a repressor/activator with multiple targets: At its general physiological concentration it may not really activate gene-X because of low affinity but in high concentrations it just may, and we end up concluding that gene-x is a target of repressor-1 by an OVEREXPRESSION experiment.

A synthetic biological approach is very good in studying small signaling/transcriptional modules. The entire module can be cloned and expressed in a cell under an inducible/constitutive promoter. This can be implemented in a heterologous cell also. A mathematical model generally helps in making certain predictions.

Other strategies which can be used instead of overexpression:

  1. using sensor constructs harboring a functional or non-functional target sites instead of overexpressing the upstream protein
  2. downregulation experiments
share|improve this answer
add comment

There are lots of different overexpression vectors (usually they're promoters/regulatory elements upstream of the transfected gene). Here's an example of an overexpression vector (overexpression vector pCAMBIA1300S) that was used to overexpress a transcription factor called NAC in rice, resulting in large phenotypic changes (drought and salt tolerance): http://www.ncgr.ac.cn/articles/2009ZhenXN_NAC.pdf

share|improve this answer
    
Can you expand a little bit maybe giving some example of how the modulation of a single gene can subsequently affect many others? –  nico Feb 5 '13 at 7:32
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.