Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it possible to sequence rRNA directly, that is, using the ribosome rather than the DNA from the nucleus? For example, this paper, Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16s rRNA gene from E. coli, suggests that it uses DNA to find the sequence. Would it be possible to isolate the rRNA and derive the sequence from that?

share|improve this question
I’m venturing a guess: probably not, due to the complex tertiary structure. I’ve just had a discussion today where it was mentioned that this is actually done for some small ncRNAs but that it isn’t done for tRNA (which is an ncRNA) due to its structure. – Konrad Rudolph Jul 19 '12 at 12:31
up vote 1 down vote accepted

As far as I know it'spossible to reverse transcribe a rRNA gene, you may not get the best yields though. The secondary / tertiary structures will be a problem, however, there are reverse transcriptase's commercially available that can handle secondary structure: Thermo-X™ Reverse Transcriptase from Invitrogen or Sensiscript™ from Qiagen.

share|improve this answer
Weirdly enough, Thermo-X is discontinued according to the website … – Konrad Rudolph Jul 20 '12 at 12:55
@KonradRudolph: Oh perhaps these can be used as alternatives then Thermoscript or Affinity Script – GWW Jul 21 '12 at 20:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.