Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If a plant, say a ficus or a teak, as a sapling were exposed to radiation, and a tree of the same species were present at the same distance, which of the two would be more likely to mutate?

share|improve this question
Aren't they all trees in the end, anyway? – jonsca Jul 25 '12 at 12:08
Either is an ecosystem in itself. – Everyone Jul 25 '12 at 13:20
Ionizing radiation is harmful because of damage to genes. It's thus far more damaging, to everything, earlier in the development cycle; down to the point of the very first cell, where relatively small doses of radiation can render the potential organism non-viable (like killing the cell outright). Random mutations all over a tree are unlikely to amount to much – Ben Brocka Jul 26 '12 at 1:40
Ben raises a good point about this question actually - @Everyone are you interested in the effect of radiation on a single cell sampled from a large tree (compared to a single cell in a sapling), or on the organisms as a whole? If it is the whole organisms, Ben has the correct answer I believe; mutations (and thus radiation) will be less of a problem to a plant once it is larger, as any cutting of the plant could go on to form a new tree; each individual cell becomes less important. (See… out of interest) – Luke Jul 26 '12 at 16:15
Depending on what plant/tree is concerned, I could also imagine things like bark absorbing some of the radiation being emitted. – LanceLafontaine Jul 26 '12 at 20:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.