Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Are "computational biology" and "bioinformatics" simply different terms for the same thing or is there a real difference?

share|improve this question
    
Probably better to ask them directly :) biostars.org Actually there are few questions going into that direction already: biostars.org/search/?q=computational+biology –  mivilar Aug 16 '12 at 9:11
1  
Thank you! I'm glad that someone recognizes that there is a difference meta.biology.stackexchange.com/a/169/389 –  bobthejoe Aug 17 '12 at 7:38
    
The answers reflect that they are unanimously accepted to be different. :) –  Chirag Aug 19 '12 at 8:07
1  
@Chirag And between the answers and comments, we're lucky enough to have 4 alternative definitions for everyone to choose from! –  Daniel Standage Aug 22 '12 at 19:51
1  
@bobthejoe I don't think anyone has suggested there is no differences, but getting the community to agree on exactly what those differences are is an exercise in futility. –  Daniel Standage Aug 22 '12 at 19:54

3 Answers 3

up vote 17 down vote accepted

I found this post by Russ Altman quite good. Below is his opinion about the two similar but distinct fields:

Computational biology: the study of biology using computational techniques. The goal is to learn new biology, knowledge about living sytems. It is about science.

Bioinformatics: the creation of tools (algorithms, databases) that solve problems. The goal is to build useful tools that work on biological data. It is about engineering.

Just as a note:

This is just one persons opinion and I have heard many other definitions for both of these terms. For example, one person I know mentioned that he believes computational biology is concerned with very theoretical research such as NP-hardness (ie. articles published in the Journal of Computational Biology). Other people think that bioinformatics is an applied field that is essentially using already published tools.

share|improve this answer
    
This is perhaps the most closest you can ever get to the definition of this field. :) –  Chirag Aug 16 '12 at 15:16
4  
As informative as this answer is, keep in mind that many (talented) scientists will disagree, or at least have a slightly different answer. –  Daniel Standage Aug 16 '12 at 16:07
    
Would bioinformatics not be more about the use of tools to solve statistical problems than the creation of such tools? –  Ultimate Gobblement Aug 16 '12 at 18:12
2  
I don’t think this definition is commonly agreed on. Where we work, most people are self-proclaimed bioinformaticians (heck, we even have it in the institute’s name) but according to this answer they’d be classified as computational biologists. They may also do the latter (because the topics are usually intrinsically linked) but the focus is definitely biological study, not development of tools. –  Konrad Rudolph Sep 5 '12 at 7:25
    
@KonradRudolph: Again the goal of my answer was not to give a concrete definition hence why I gave an additional note showing other people have varying opinions on what they are. The definitions are going to be very institute / lab specific depending on what their research topics and goals are. –  GWW Sep 5 '12 at 12:26

I think this question is on topic here, although yes you would definitely get a lot of answers at BioStars. But consider this from the bioinformatics tag wiki on this site.

Bioinformatics is a broad field that interfaces a variety of life science disciplines (biology, genetics, biochemistry, biophysics, etc) with a variety of quantitative sciences (mathematics, statistics, computer science, engineering, etc). Bioinformatics techniques typically involve developing and applying software and algorithms to computationally intensive biological questions, such as those common in structural biology, genomics, sequence analysis, and systems biology.

Some scientists draw a distinction between the term bioinformatics and computational biology. While these areas indeed broad and diverse, these distinctions in terms are not consistent or well-defined.

Case in point: @GWW's answer cites two different definitions, while another has already been suggested in response to his answer (as a comment). More definitions are sure to come from additional answers, comments, and edits. None of these definitions are necessarily wrong, but in the same way none are "right" as there is no objective way to determine which of the definitions is "better" than the others. If you were to ask 5 experts in the field, you are likely to get 5 different definitions.

share|improve this answer
    
There must be an option to choose multiple answers :) –  Chirag Aug 16 '12 at 15:20
1  
@Chirag Well, unfortunately there are many "good" answers to this question...which is kind of the point. –  Daniel Standage Aug 16 '12 at 16:09
    
+1 but I shall contest that the formation of that tag was contested (by myself) meta.biology.stackexchange.com/q/168/389 –  bobthejoe Aug 17 '12 at 7:39

Computational Biology - usually involves creating a model (software or other logic) where you attempt to shed light on some process of biology by building information flows using known physics/chemistry/biology --- (how to cells divide ? -> build a biomechanic model of mitotic spindles ...) --- You are building up complexity in your model to simulate biology

Bioinformatics --> measure biology then analyze the data --- biology already has the complexity --- You are attempting to understand this complexity

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.