Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Wikipedia definition of "hybrid" offers many competing definitions. But most seem to be centered on sexual-reproduction gene transfer.

Is there an official (in a textbook or widely accepted peer reviewed work) definition of a "hybrid"/"hybridization" that would clearly include ANY genetic mixing, most specifically obtaining genes via horizontal gene transfer?

If not, is it specifically because "hybrid" requires sexual reproduction, or merely because it requires a certain minimal amount of inherited genetic material from both sides, and horisontal genetic transfer in practice involves significantly less genetic material being inherited?

share|improve this question
Full transparency: the question originated on SFF StackExchange, pertaining to whether Alien chestburster can legitimately be called a "hybrid" from a biology point of view, on the basis of it obtaining a variety of phenotypal features of the host body via horizontal-gene-transfer. It's mostly a definition issue. – DVK Aug 18 '12 at 21:11

As you point out, there isn't a singularly accepted biological defnition of 'hybrid.' The most basic would be a single organism that exhibits traits of two individual organisms, but that will find perfectly acceptable disagreement depending on who you talk to. You, for instance, are human - but a hybrid of your parents' genomes.

So I would personally say that horizontal gene transfer is equivalent to gene inheritance, and that as long as the organism exhibited traits of both 'parent' individuals - then yes, it is a hybrid. Some might include that even if it didn't exhibit traits and merely contained the genes in any inherited genomic data that the hybrid label would be appropriate.

share|improve this answer
I'm looking for definitions that could be considered "legit". Textbooks, or barring that, widely respected/cited paper; that explicitly defines "hybrid" as inclusive of H.G.T. (or rather not exclusive of it). E.g. where the end result (gene mix) is relevant as opposed to mechanism of mixing. – DVK Aug 19 '12 at 1:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.