Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm a biology amateur, but it seems like sexual selection is almost always performed based on physical characteristics, the outcome of physical contests, or some sort elaborate courtship. But do any non Homo-Sapiens perform sexual selection based on intelligence factors, like problem solving abilities? If so, how does the species accomplish this? I know natural selection as a whole would definitely favor intelligent individuals, but I'm curious if any species actually takes this into account when choosing mates.

share|improve this question
9  
Alas, selection based on intelligence is often absent in Homo Sapiens... –  nico Dec 26 '11 at 23:10
2  
Super question. –  Poshpaws Dec 27 '11 at 10:24
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 29 down vote accepted

Very intresting question. The problem is that animal intelligence is hard to measure not only for scientists, but probably also for the potential mate. Paradoxically, that is why selection for intelligence, if it occurred, may be very strong. One has to be smart in order to recognise smart behaviour, so preference and preferred feature are strongly connected. But that's only my opinion.

Boogert et al., 2011 1 reviews the current knowledge about animal preferences for cognition skills. They conclude that there is very little data on this subject. The given examples are:

1) Preference for elaborating birds songs (as songs are not inborn and have to be learned)

2) Spatial abilities:

In meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), males with better spatial learning and memory abilities were not only found to have larger home ranges and to locate more females in the field (Spritzer, Solomon, et al. 2005 2) but were also preferred by females in mate-choice tests, even though the females did not observe males’ performance on spatial tests (Spritzer, Meikle, et al. 2005 3).

In guppies (Poecilia reticulata), males that learned faster to swim through mazes to gain a food reward were found to be more attractive to females (Shohet and Watt 2009 4). However, females were not able to see the males’ performance in the mazes. Although male learning ability was weakly correlated with saturation of the orange patches on his body (a sexually selected trait (...)), orange saturation surprisingly did not correlate with female preferences. Thus, the cues leading female guppies to prefer faster learners are unknown.

It is possible, that females base their choose on some factors that correlates with cognitive skills or on total wellness, what may depend on intelligence.

3) bowerbird's abilities to build bowers (courtship constructions):

Comparative studies across bowerbird species have shown that relative brain size is larger in species that build bowers than in closely related nonbuilding species (Madden 2001 5). In addition, relative brain size increases with the species-typical complexity of the bower (Madden 2001 5), and a comparative study on the relative size of specific brain regions showed that species with more complex bowers have a relatively larger cerebellum (Day et al. 2005 6).

4) foraging performance

A recent experiment by Snowberg and Benkman (2009) 7 using red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) showed that, after observing 2 males extracting seeds from conifer cones, females associated preferentially with the more efficient forager of the 2. The authors were able to exclude female choice for correlated traits by experimentally manipulating foraging efficiency, such that fewer seeds were available in the cones of one of the males. The males were also swapped between treatments (i.e., slow vs. fast forager) so that male identity could not explain the females’ preferences for the most efficient forager.


Another way that intelligence may be favored by sexual selection is "cheating" during courtship. For example most frog species call to attract females. But this signal may also attract aggresive rivals or predators. Some males, especially the weaker ones, do not call but stay near calling individual. This allows them to avoid confrontation and wait for approaching females [8]. The successfulness of this strategy may depend on how "smart" the individual is (only my opinion).

[1] Boogert, N. J., Fawcett, T. W., & Lefebvre, L. (2011). Mate choice for cognitive traits: a review of the evidence in nonhuman vertebrates. Behavioral Ecology, 22(3), 447-459.

[2] Spritzer MD, Solomon NG, Meikle DB. 2005. Influence of scramble competition for mates upon the spatial ability of male meadow voles. Anim Behav. 69:375–386.

[3] Spritzer MD, Meikle DB, Solomon NG. 2005. Female choice based on male spatial ability and aggressiveness among meadow voles. Anim Behav. 69:1121–1130.

[4] Shohet AJ, Watt PJ. 2009. Female guppies Poecilia reticulata prefer males that can learn fast. J Fish Biol. 75:1323–1330.

[5] Madden J. 2001. Sex, bowers and brains. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 268:833–838.

[6] Day LB, Westcott DA, Olster DH. 2005. Evolution of bower complexity and cerebellum size in bowerbirds. Brain Behav Evol. 66:62–72

[7] Snowberg LK, Benkman CW. 2009. Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait. J Evol Biol. 22:762–769.

[8] Bateson P. 1985. Mate choice. Cambridge University Press. 181-210

share|improve this answer
add comment

I know nothing about biology however I did watch an amazing PBS documentary on cuttlefish that I think is fairly relevent.

From http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/nature/kings-of-camouflage.html

NARRATOR: During mating, males outnumber the females, sometimes 10 to one. And they're all looking for the chance to pass on their genes. While a female lays eggs beneath a rock, a big male tries to monopolize her, staving off the other hopeful suitors.

Sometimes intimidation alone won't work, and the competitors hurl themselves into a violent and bizarre looking wrestling match.

Like an octopus, they'll squirt out an inky smokescreen when it's time for a hasty retreat.

But size and strength aren't the only ways to impress the ladies.

Thanks to the cuttlefish's skin morphing talents, the smaller males have a clever trick up their sleeve.

MARK NORMAN: The really interesting thing in this system is actually far less obvious, and when you first dive with them, you don't see it. It takes a while before you realize what's going on.

The small males, who have no chance in a contest with a big male, are actually doing something completely different. They're effectively cross-dressing. They're dressing up as a female, by pulling in their webs and putting on this mottled color pattern and gliding past these big, aggressive male, pretending to be a female, and will come in to the female underneath.

And what happens is, as another big male comes in and a potential conflict between these big guys starts up, the sneaker males start mating with her, successfully mate with the female, while the big guy isn't even aware of it.

NARRATOR: The cross-dressers' success is all the more impressive because the females often play hard to get, as Roger Hanlon has seen firsthand.

ROGER HANLON: These females are very picky. They reject 70 percent of approaches for mating. Yet they only reject 30 percent of the cross-dressing males. So this trick gets them in the door, so to speak, past the fighting male, and they're accepted by the female.

share|improve this answer
    
Sounds a lot like humans to me. Explain why females pick jerks rather than normal guy with money. If guys with money approach females, they got beaten up by stronger males with anti prostitution laws. Then some guy just seduce, and it works. Maybe it's how we are set up. –  Jim Thio Feb 28 '12 at 2:40
    
@JimThio I think Cracked has an answer for that here. cracked.com/… –  Biff MaGriff Feb 28 '12 at 16:41
add comment

Since when do humans engage in sexual selection based on intelligence? Humans DO NOT select mates based on intelligence. Just like animals, human sexual selection is primarily based on physical traits.

  1. If sexual selection for intelligence exists, why aren't great scientists or geniuses (Edward Witten, Terence Tao) etc sexualized in modern celebrity culture and have hoards of female followers, instead of the likes of attractive actors, athletes, musicians (Brad Pitt? Cristiano Ronaldo?) etc?

  2. Excessive intelligence is a NEGATIVE trait in human sexual selection. If you put a math nerd next to a NFL football star, without a doubt the latter will have access to a never ending supply of vaginas while the former will most likely suffer long years of involuntary celibacy.

  3. Due to above, quite arguably it can be said human females select LESS intelligent males as their mate of choice. This mechanism exists to limit the growth of intelligence in our species - most likely, higher intelligence would result in high cranial capacity, which may make childbirth impossible.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm not going to flag or downvote yet, but your last sentence is the only one that's relevant to the question. I would suggest adding some citations for your last point rather than invoking pop culture in a biology question. –  Gordon Gustafson Jun 17 at 12:55
    
I totally agree with Gordon. Also, please make the answer less theatrical and more fact-based. –  WYSIWYG Jun 17 at 13:02
    
You should definitely edit this answer. Actually it is mostly opinion based I would say. –  Chris Jun 17 at 13:04
    
How can you add citation to something that is self evident? How can you say my statement is 'not fact based' and is 'opinion based', when all of the factual evidences I presented here is true? Are you disagreeing with the fact that an average NFL player is more popular with women than an average math nerd? In fact, the only thing that can be considered as an 'opinion' is my theory at the last sentence of the #3. What further 'evidence' do you want? A comparison of hot-or-not results (results being obvious) using pictures of Edward Witten vs Brad Pitt? –  user8056 Jun 17 at 13:29
    
The answer is relevant to the question, because the asker of the question appeared to be misled into thinking that Homo sapiens do engage in sexual selection for intelligence. –  user8056 Jun 17 at 13:37
show 4 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.