Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given the human heart is autonomous, can a person die instantly from internal damage to the head/brain? I would expect the heart to continue to pulse until it ran out of energy ...

My contention is whether brain-injury can cause death, albeit Memming raised a deeper question - What is the biological definition of death?

share|improve this question
2  
What do you mean by instantaneously? What do you mean by die? If one looses consciousness irreversibly in 10 ms, would you consider to be instantaneous? –  Memming Sep 22 '12 at 23:30
    
Indeed, I would. –  Everyone Sep 23 '12 at 1:59
    
I did not downvote, but this question is not clear. It sounds like there are two questions, a rather difficult philosophical question about the meaning of death in unspecified cases where it is difficult to tell if someone is dead and another question as to whether one can die quickly (again not sure how quickly) from brain injury, which seems a little to simple. I mean why wouldn't someone die instantly of a brain injury? What's the trick are you talking about nanoseconds? –  shigeta Sep 24 '12 at 3:20

1 Answer 1

Please consider this only as a starting point (although a lengthy one), and a race against an acute onset of tl:dr ...

A person cannot die instantaneously from internal brain damage (under everyday circumstances). The reason is the non-centralized architecture of the brain and that consciousness is a global phenomenon which underlie the activity of many brain structures.

These brain structures are themselves comprised of a cellular hierarchy, with each cell being self-sufficient for at least a time regime in the order of minutes. As such the brain underlies to some extend the study of networks and robustness thereof. The brain also maintains a scale-free organization . Actual Scale free networks in nature are known to be robust.

Instantaneous in this context means a consciously discernible difference in time, which is on the order of tens of milliseconds (See: Inspection time, mental chronometry).

Also I narrow the medical cause of death down to a intracerebral haemorrhage, systemic shock or hypoxia. I definitely leave out all (rare) CNS-immunological phenomena (e.g. explosive brain death, Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome related,... )

But, effects that can mimmick instantaneous brain death are very plausible.

Notably, this question can be answered despite there being no rigorous consensus model of consciousness.


Consider the following just as pointers, but not as qualified, thoroughly sourced information, - contrary to a paper or review ( I will gladly include your resources, or turn this post into a community wiki if demand to do so exists):

Consciousness:

The brain weighs only 2% of the human body mass, yet consumes 20% of the total energy at rest. Crucially the brain can deplete oxygen at a great rate, which is proportional to the brain activity in various regions, giving rise to indirect measurements of brain topology and images like these: enter image description here

"Visualization of a DTI measurement of a human brain"-2006, 
author: Thomas Schultz, DOR: 25/09/2012

Humans have different states of consciousness which show different overall patterns of brain activity. As such the result a scientist would witness through an high-resolution fMRI/PET scanner in a stroking-individual would differ during sleep, sleep/wake transition or various levels of awareness during the days. Stroking and the effects on the brain is studied quite extensively with rats(See: rat, fMRI, stroke).

Moreover the brain activity, fine-anatomy and orchestration of brain utilization differs from individual to individual. In short the brain is what neurologists call "plastic" Neuroplasticity is the change of entire brain structures, and the brain itself from experience and physical stress/trauma (on the brain).

We are biologial enetities which have evolved to be in-sync with the planetary rotation and solar energy influx. As such brain activity changes during the day, in accordance with our circadian rythm or biorhythm, and if it weren't for artificial lightning brain activity would change over the seasons as well.

Connecting all the dots: Describing brain death in a seconds-regime comes down to which areas in an individual brain consume the most oxygen and "shut down" first, and which processes steer brain activity till organic shutdown.

Since Stackexchange has a strong programmatic background, to put it in a somewhat programmatic analogy:

The output of a memory dump and its analytic result depend on the hardware, the software and the state of the application. Unfortunately the software is spread across processors, has multiple threads and applies a genetic algorithm with dynamic recompilation.

Death Definitions:

The notion of instant death is a cultural meme (which one can witness in child's play) and is further propagated in the media. Additionally "death" is a highly political matter...
"Death" has numerous legal definitions (throughout various cultures) medical definitions and biological definitions depending on the context. Legal definitions depends on the culturally dependent legal corpus, medical definitions on the state of (pragmatic) technologies. The medical definition of human death is influenced by the legal definition. The legal definition in turn is influenced by politics. The biological definition of death depends on the context and a threshold thereof, which in turn describes the level and and of hierarchical systems or one large system comprised out of systems such as organs. An organ is the collection of units in one structural one to serve a common purpose.

Finally to answer more accurately, a person cannot (under everyday circumstances) shutdown brain activity within the time-interval of one reaction time-unit or 'cycle', but may transition between discernible states of global brain-activity. Such states may only be measurable with functional Imaging techniques and classifiable using computer algorithms.

share|improve this answer
1  
Interesting answer but please don't use random code formatting as it's not really suitable –  Rory M Sep 26 '12 at 10:18
    
I've replaced all instances with more appropriate highlighting, however I'm not sure they're all necessary so you might want to remove some of the emphasis. –  Rory M Sep 26 '12 at 10:24

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.