Sign up ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why does the left hemisphere control the right and the right hemisphere control the left? I googled it but didn't find a good answer regarding this. Could someone explain? Does this adaptation help in the speed of transmission of nerve impulses?

share|improve this question
I'd bet it's non-adaptive. –  Noah Snyder Oct 5 '12 at 15:08
You seem to accept that we have two brain hemispheres that each control one half of the body without questionning this fact and then ask why does the left part control the right part and vice-versa. If we do so, as @NoahSnyder, I would tend to think that such thing is not adaptive because I think there were two possible solutions (cross wiring or no same-side wiring) that are equally fit and one was randomly chosen! –  Remi.b Jan 1 '14 at 18:58
See also: –  Memming Feb 20 '14 at 0:09

5 Answers 5

It's for control, coordination and balance. From a mathematical point of view, parallel lines won't intersect and thus line A won't affect line B unless they intersect and thus would hardly influence the other unless and an external force is applied to any of the lines.

This is also why corpus callosum connects the left and the right side of the brain.

share|improve this answer
Could you please add references to this response! –  Bez Aug 19 '14 at 0:28

Just to get the ball rolling here. This particular aspect of brain evolution is very old. The cross wiring of the hemispheres of the brain seems to be as old as the right and left hemispheres itself. It predates lizards - i.e. hundreds of millions of years ago. It possibly predates right/left dominance and the organ assymetry which puts the heart on the left side of the body.

Digging back deeper, we can see that worms have bilateral brain structure, I would guess that this means that the phenomenon is as old as bilateral symmetry itself - putting the development in the pre-cambrian era, which is the best part of billion years ago. Echinoderms (like starfish) are 'missing links' in bilateral symmetry as their larval stage has bilateral symmetry even though the adult has radial symmetry. Such wiring may be so embedded in the way most animal body plans develop that it hasn't changed in evolutionary history.

Still one might guess that the cross over of neurons in brain control is good for integrating the signals from both sides of the organism somehow. I'm sure someone else can post a better guess than this!

share|improve this answer

It is simple. The brain through evolution split into two hemispheres when binocular vision was evolving. If you follow the neurons from the eye, the lateral neurons travel to the ipsilateral hemisphere. The medial neurons cross to the contralateral hemisphere. I would bet the protopathic pathways were around in evolutionary terms before binocular vision and the epicritic pathways developed after binary vision. Vision drove the hemispheres into two compartments. I could draw the diagram but unable to do so on this response

share|improve this answer
Welcome to Biology SE. This answer could do with some references - see the guidelines on how to write a good answer –  rg255 May 9 '14 at 14:05

Being a keen student of game theory and behavioural sciences one reason that comes to my mind is for the opposite wiring of brain hemispheres might be that

  • if right hemisphere controlled the right side and left hemisphere controlled the left side than cross hemisphere links and activity would be hard to achieve so the most efficient way of increasing cross hemisphere communication, links and activity with the least stress on physical resources is the opposite hemisphere wiring.

  • The second view (it might sound like voodoo I know) that also compliments this cross arrangement might be the underlying law of increase in complexity and entropy (second law of thermodynamics), which is embedded in the universe from its births, dictates an increase in complexity hence cross wiring also achieves this underlying goal of increasing complexity because if you think about it straight wiring would have been too simple for such a complex structure as the brain.

share|improve this answer
It seems a bit voodoo indeed! I don't think the second law of thermodynamic can bring any insight into the general tendency observed in living things to increase in complexity through evolution. But the discussion might be interesting. But if your answer was an real explanation, you could use it to explain so many different weird phenotypes on earth. That makes me think that it is not really a satisfying explanation. But it's good to try such voodoo-like suggestions ;-) –  Remi.b Jan 1 '14 at 18:52

When I was in school it was discussed as an evolutionary survival advantage... If you are attacked from the right side, the left side of the brain is less likely to be damaged and can use the right sided limbs to fend off the attack as opposed to the right side being damaged and less responsive..

share|improve this answer
+1 Interesting Hypothesis. –  Remi.b Jan 1 '14 at 18:52
I've also head this repeated at undergraduate level –  Rory M Feb 9 '14 at 16:35

protected by AliceD yesterday

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.