Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why do some biologists refer to single-celled organisms such as Amoeba and Paramecium as acellular (i.e., without cells) rather than unicellular (i.e., one cell)?

share|improve this question
Can you point us to an example of this? – Alan Boyd Oct 11 '12 at 12:52

From Wikipedia:

Some biologists refer to wholly syncytial organisms as "acellular" because their bodies contain multiple nuclei which are not separated by cell walls.

As Albano pointed out, "cell walls" should probably be "cell membranes".

Paramecium and some types of amoeba like the Chaos genus have multiple nuclei so they fall under this definition.

share|improve this answer
Our own cells are not separated by cell walls either. This is an error in Wikipedia. It should probably read "cell membranes". – S. Albano Oct 11 '12 at 6:17
@S.Albano yes you are right it should probably be cellular membranes. – Bitwise Oct 11 '12 at 13:22
@Bitwise, I stand corrected thank you. Comment removed to avoid confusion. – terdon Oct 11 '12 at 13:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.