Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How long ago can human genes be traced? Are there any genes that go back unchanged to the beginning of life on Earth? And if so, how many?

share|improve this question
2  
Glycolysis seems to be a core pathway of all domains of life: biology.stackexchange.com/questions/2934/… –  LanceLafontaine Oct 19 '12 at 21:38
1  
The term to look for is 'ubiquitous' (genes/proteins). Apart from glycolysis and ribosome there is nucleotide synthesis and some (but not all) amino acid synthesis. This list is still not complete. –  rwst Oct 22 '12 at 10:41
add comment

3 Answers 3

I very much agree with bitwise's answer. I just want to point out that even in terms of nucleotide sequence there are some extremely conserved genes.

The most highly conserved are ribosomal RNA genes. The image below shows the conservation of 16S rRNAs from archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes (eukaryotes do not have 16S in their cellular genome but the gene is present in the DNA of mitochondria and chloroplasts). Residues in red are conserved across all domains of life (image source):

enter image description here

A very nice study from 2008 [1] identified tRNA genes as the next most conserved and ABC transporter nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) after that. The alignment below (taken from the paper) shows the conservation of NBDs from various species. Note that they include eukaryotes, archaea and bacteria: [2] enter image description here

If you look at orthologous genes in general, without specifying a specific level of sequence identity, then you can find various genes (notably those coding for the enzymes of the glycolysis pathway as mentioned in the comments) that are conserved across most, if not all, cellular life.

So, to answer your question probably yes. At least, there are genes in humans today that can be found in all or almost all other life forms. Whether there were present in LUCA we cannot know for sure, it does seem likely however given how widespread they are today.

Reference

  1. Isenbarger T.A. et al, The most conserved genome segments for life detection on Earth and other planets, Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2008 Dec;38(6):517-33.
share|improve this answer
    
@leonardo, thanks. –  terdon Oct 23 '12 at 23:08
add comment

One thing still missing from the other answers: How many genes? One answer: about 6400, i.e. ~30% of all human genes can be traced back to LUCA.

To come up with this number, I used the eggNOG database of orthologous groups. This database contains clusters of proteins that are probably homologous. So I checked how many human genes are in clusters that also contain bacterial genes. These are 6416 human genes, belonging to 1320 clusters.

Caveats: In some cases, the genes are too diverged and so their homology is missed. It is also possible that a protein evolved in bacteria after LUCA and then got transferred to eukaryotes, and vice versa.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Depends on what you mean by unchanged. If you mean a gene that maintained the same nucleotide sequence, then the answer is no.

If you meant a gene that descends from a very ancient gene, i.e. one can find orthologs in very distant species, then the answer is yes. Many of the basic molecular systems are relatively conserved, including several metabolic paths and information processing machinery. This homology is one of the strongest molecular supports for evolution and also one of the reasons that genetic engineering works so nicely.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.