Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

During DNA replication, RNA primase puts an RNA primer in the lagging strand. What is the function of this RNA primer? Why can't the enzymes put DNA fragments directly?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

DNA polymerases need a primer oligonucleotide (RNA or DNA) - their substrates are an existing 3'-OH group and a dNTP. The primase however is a typical RNA polymerase, capable of initiating polynucleotide synthesis de novo by positioning a complementary ribonucleoside 5'-triphosphate opposite its complementary DNA base. The primase makes an RNA primer that the DNA polymerase can then use for chain extension. The RNA primer is ultimately degraded and replaced by a DNA polymerase.

The rationale for this difference is that DNA polymerases have an active site that is geared towards proofreading and that primerless initiation would be an error-prone process. By having the primers 'tagged' by virtue of them being RNA, it is possible for the replication machinery to use them but then replace them with a high fidelity DNA copy of the template strand.

Edit in response to OP comment: Synthesis of the leading strand consists of extending an existing DNA. However the leading strand is also originally initiated, at the ori element, with an RNA primer. Once that first initiation event has taken place the synthesis of the leading strand is simply a process of extending that original primer.

Some viruses employ ingenious variations on this theme such as using tRNA primers , or proteins - see Wikipedia.

share|improve this answer
    
so why doesn't DNA polymerase need RNA primer in leading strand? –  Rafique Dec 13 '12 at 8:00
    
OK.thanks a lot bro....i really appreciate for giving time to answer..:) –  Rafique Dec 13 '12 at 8:22
    
Well, if the answer is useful, you might consider giving it an upvote, or even possibly accepting it. Entirely up to you of course - before accepting might be worth waiting for a day or two in case a better answer comes along. –  Alan Boyd Dec 13 '12 at 9:02
    
well i tried many time to vote it..but i need 15 reputations. i have 11 now...so the first i will do when i get 15 reptutations is that i will vote this answer...:) –  Rafique Dec 13 '12 at 10:01
    
"but then replace them with a high fidelity DNA copy of the template strand" - I would suggest adding that at the very end of eukaryote (linear) chromosomes, there will not be any way to replace the RNA primer with DNA and it will hence be removed along with the leftover sDNA end to which it was attached - resulting in telomere shortening. –  Armatus May 29 '13 at 10:06
add comment

In simple terms:

Function of the RNA primer: DNA polymerases need a double-stranded DNA region to which they can attach in order to begin copying the rest of the DNA strand. In order to provide this double-stranded attachment site, RNA primers are added by primase, an RNA polymerase which does not require such an attachment site itself.

When DNA replication starts, one primer is needed at the start of the leading strand. The lagging strand will need new primers regularly, and they mark the start of the stretches known as Okazaki fragments.

Why is RNA used instead of DNA?: Adding primers is an error-prone process, and DNA replication must copy the original strand with as high fidelity as possible. Using RNA for primers and then copying the original using DNA means that there is "memory" of which bits of the new strand were originally primers and hence more likely to contain errors (any RNA in the copy must have been primers). This allows removing them, in order to then replace them with proper high-fidelity DNA copies. When this happens, there is double-stranded DNA around the sites where primers were located, allowing DNA polymerases to attach there and fill in the gaps.

Aside from this, I would guess using RNA for priming may be more energy-efficient as RNA is more reactive than DNA.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.