Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question pretty much explains itself. How do the two methods compare? I've always used Assembly PCR but the method is prone to mistakes and I'm curious how it compares to Ligase Chain Reaction (LCR).

share|improve this question
I am looking at this myself for gene synthesis. OpenWetWare has a link to discussing the two. –  Kevin May 28 '13 at 15:25

1 Answer 1

I have used both Gibson assembly (what you mean by assembly?) and LCR as replacements for blunt or sticky ended cloning. LCR has, for me, worked better in that a higher proportion of constructs that come out have been assembled correctly and I have noticed no mutations after LCR while I have seen them somewhat often with Gibson.

share|improve this answer
Welcome at Biology SE! Your answer is greatly appreciated, but on this site we prefer answers backed up with scientific references, Please provide objective references (if possible) to support your answer. –  Nandor Poka May 5 at 19:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.