Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a follow-up question to How likely would Abraham Lincoln be to survive his wounds today?

You don't have to see a CT scan or autopsy to know if the brainstem is injured (directly or indirectly), if it doesn't work right.

The description of the first doc at the scene mentioned that Lincoln was not breathing, and one pupil was dilated (the latter a clear and unequivocal sign of dysfunction of the third cranial nerve or the upper brainstem, from where it comes). Unfortunately, the second doc described the enlarged pupil being the right one (it's extremely unlikely to have been one and then the other - one of the doc's was probably mistaken as to the side).

By 3 hours after injury, both pupils were fixed and dilated, and Lincoln showed extensor (decerebrate) posturing - again, all signs of profound brainstem dysfunction (but not yet brain death, though pretty close to it).

Now, what is decerebrate posturing? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abnormal_posturing#Decerebrate

Decerebrate posturing is also called decerebrate response, decerebrate rigidity, or extensor posturing. It describes the involuntary extension of the upper extremities in response to external stimuli. In decerebrate posturing, the head is arched back, the arms are extended by the sides, and the legs are extended.[6] A hallmark of decerebrate posturing is extended elbows.[12] The arms and legs are extended and rotated internally.[13] The patient is rigid, with the teeth clenched.[13] The signs can be on just one or the other side of the body or on both sides, and it may be just in the arms and may be intermittent.[13]

A person displaying decerebrate posturing in response to pain gets a score of two in the motor section of the Glasgow Coma Scale (for adults) and the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale (for infants). Decerebrate posturing indicates brain stem damage, specifically damage below the level of the red nucleus (e.g. mid-collicular lesion). It is exhibited by people with lesions or compression in the midbrain and lesions in the cerebellum

share|improve this question

migrated from cogsci.stackexchange.com Jan 23 '12 at 2:43

This question came from our site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry.

    
I think this question needs to be more self contained; the quote needs to be put in context. –  Jeromy Anglim Jan 20 '12 at 1:21
    
Okay - the context is here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abnormal_posturing#Decerebrate. I'll add another quote for it. –  InquilineKea Jan 20 '12 at 2:38

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The decerebrate posturing is a sign of major brainstem dysfunction.

The reversibility of this state (which is considered to be very critical and hardly reversible) depends upon the origin of the brainstem dysfunction.

The primary brainstem dysfunction means that the brainstem was directly damaged (by a bullet) and there is no way that this can be quickly reversed. This is exactly the case here and there are no chances that the brainstem might recooperate with time.

The secondary brainstem dysfunction may be caused by cerebral edema and thereby dislocation of the brainstem towards foramen magnum, where the brainstem is coned. The coning of the brainstem can be reversible if the brain edema is treated quickly and effectively (by administration of diuretics in the intravenal catheter.

With brainstem regaining its normal functions the decerebral posture will eventuall resolve and depending upon the residual brain injury the recooperation of the brain function (and compensation) may be almost entire.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.