Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Has anyone ever conducted an evolution experiment and quantitatively compared it to theory? For example, has anyone ever put bacteria in a million petri dishes filled with antibiotics and calculated the number of petri dishes that should develop drug-resistant bacteria, and then compared that calculation with the experiment?

I imagine that both the experiment and theoretical modeling would be very difficult, but maybe someone has been ambitious enough to try it.

share|improve this question
If this is possible, I'd be particularly interested in finding out what variables they took into account in their calculations. – LanceLafontaine Apr 15 '13 at 2:10
I'm not really sure what the theoretical model would be. But really, I just wanted to say that you might enjoy reading about the Luria-Delbruck fluctuation experiment, which is tangentially relevant - see – Alan Boyd Apr 15 '13 at 11:24

I think the closest example to this is Greg Lang's work at Princeton. His work will take a population of yeast and let it grow for 1000 generations. At each generation a sample will be kept allowing sequencing of the population at each generation. His website is available here:

And some of his work has already been published here:

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.