Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For what reason(s) is allolactose, instead of lactose, the "natural" inducer of lac operon repressor?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

When lactose is present in a cell, some of it is enzymatically converted by $\beta$-galactosidase from the $\beta(1,4)$ linkage (typical of lactose) to the $\beta(1,6)$ glycosidic linkage (becoming allolactose). Allolactose and other analogues can then bind LacI to induce the appropriate conformational change and unbind the lac operator (one such review here).

Why does allolactose act as a signal of lactose presence instead of just lactose? From the perspective of the lac operon, there is no operational difference between lactose and allolactose -- either way one molecule binds LacI and cannot be metabolized while bound. The full paradox is explained by Edgel and summarized by well-known biochemistry textbook author and scientist, Larry Moran, on his personal blog. The short version is that neither allolactose nor lactose are the intended substrates for $\beta$-gal and instead a different sugar entirely is the "natural" inducer and substrate.

  1. Juers DH, Matthews BW, Huber RE. LacZ β-galactosidase: structure and function of an enzyme of historical and molecular biological importance. Protein Sci. 2012 1792-807.

  2. Egel R. The 'lac' operon: an irrelevant paradox? Trends Genet. 1988 Feb;4(2):31.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.