Biology Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for biology researchers, academics, and students. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Restriction enzymes usually cut only at palindromic sequences. Is there any specific reason for that ? Is there any advantage for bacteria if it cuts up virus at this type of sequences ?

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

First, not all restriction enzymes cut at palindromic sequences. A lot of them do though, simply because it is more effective. Recognising a palindromic sequence enables them to cut both strands of DNA at the "same" site, because the strand will have the same sequence only in different directions at that site.

See Wikipedia for example.

share|improve this answer
Of are right but what advantage did a bacteria have by evolving such enzymes (which cut at palindromic sites)? – biogirl Aug 22 '13 at 7:50
That it's going to cut both strands. So it is more efficient. – skymningen Aug 22 '13 at 8:30
Yes you are right.Many of the bacteriophages are double stranded. Thanks :) – biogirl Aug 22 '13 at 8:48

These REs, that recognize palindromes, are mostly homodimers and hence the same sequences (for each monomer)for recognition, only they are reversed. This explains the palindromes.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.