Tag Info

Hot answers tagged

26

The answer to this, I reckon, is that they don't. They use molecular oxygen (O2) dissolved in the water for respiration, where it acts as a terminal electron acceptor, just as we use molecular oxygen in the air for respiration. We can speak of the water as being oxygenated. Water is split in photosynthesis, where reducing equivalents from water are used ...


11

Cetaceans (i.e., marine mammals) evolved from certain ancient land based mammals, thus the tail is essentially convergent evolution of the tail function.


10

Answer The mechanism for salmon natal homing isn't exactly known, but there are really two good hypotheses out there. Salmon have an extremely good sense of smell. One hypothesis is that they retain an imprint of their birthplace's odor, and manage to recognize it again at a later time (as explained by this article). Another hypothesis: the Earth's ...


10

While fish tend to move from side to side (lateral undulation) for which a vertical tail makes sense, the land ancestors of marine mammals had their limbs under them and so their spines were already adapted to up and down movement (dorsoventral undulation). When these animals moved to marine environments, they continued up and down movement in their ...


5

Sharks sense their prey with the normal senses, they see, hear and smell them. They have a remarkable sensitive sense of smelling, which enables them to sense highly diluted traces of prey. They can also use their smelling to determine the direction where a certain smell comes from. This is achieved by the timing in which the senses arrive in different ...


5

I can't answer your third, but I can answer your first two. With one word, in fact: Bioluminescence http://brightnepenthe.blogspot.com/2010/08/palate-cleanser-90.html That's the deep ocean at night for ya. Unlike underground environments and caves, it's not pitch black pretty much anywhere in the ocean. There are things to see everywhere, and they play ...


5

Intelligence is something which has to have a definition, and there are many, but I would cautiously say no. The reason that I say this is because swarming behavior can be largely reproduced by a simple set of rules - matching distance to your neighbors and direction and speed as well. To me this really removes any intention or even conscious element to ...


4

The mechanisms of osmoregulation is different for sharks (and other elasmobranch fishes) and teleost fishes. In Elasmobranchs the body osmolarity is maintained equal to the seawater by Na⁺ Cl⁻ and urea. Toxicity because of high concentrations of urea (strong chaotrope) is counteracted by high levels of trimethylamine oxide (TMAO). So, the elasmobranchs do ...


4

This due to a phenomenon called "cold shock". This induces a number of physiological changes in the fishs metabolism and also in its behaviour and can lead to death. The first paper cites some reasons in table 1: Brain and central nervous system response: Changes in neuronal activity Catecholamine and corticosteroid response: Release of hormones due to ...


3

I'm taking this question at face value. Yes, fish have gills, but we also have a respiratory surface in our lungs so why couldn't we 'breathe' water and extract the oxygen (since extraction is a simple matter of diffusion from the content of the lungs into the blood). Apparently we use 550 L of pure O2 per day. This works out as approximately 400 g. The ...


3

If you have a man in a box scenario where you only look at numbers, the answer is, no, he won't last 14 days.[1] The difficulty with this question for me is that the body doesn't always behave the way it's supposed to. The 3-3-3 rule (3 minutes without air, 3 days without water, three weeks without food) and the "100 hour rule" (4.166 days) aren't ...


3

It's probably bacteria. Here's a pdf describing the phenomenon, along with an in-depth history of the reported occurrence, which should tell you everything you might want to know. These seafood products exhibited luminescence due to the presence of certain bacteria that are capable of emitting light. Luminescence by bacteria is due to a chemical ...


3

It's an example of SYMBIOSIS Clownfishes(Amphiprion ocellaris) are never found without an anemone as they have this obligate association with them. Although they can survive without them, but studies show they are much more healthier with than without. This association is more of a survival necessity. These anemones are actually toxic and the fish is ...


2

The answer provided by @MCM contains an important chunk of information (Bioluminescence!) but it does not answer the question entirely. First, let's correct a misunderstanding in the question. Sunlight does penetrate beyond 200m in the ocean. The intensity is not enough for photosynthesis to occur (and thus no phytoplankton below 200m) but depths between ...


2

For DNA extraction, you would need only a few eggs. PCR would then give you all the copies of your target gene(s). A quick Google Scholar search on Takifugu fecundity revealed a paper by Yang and Chen (2008). They found that T. obscurus produced an average of 320.8 oocytes mg$^{-1}$ ovary wet weight. In comparison, T. ocellatus produced 125.2 oocytes ...


2

Wikipedia has some revealing information here: Not all puffers are necessarily poisonous; Takifugu oblongus, for example, is a fugu puffer that is not poisonous, and toxin level varies wildly even in fish that are. A puffer's neurotoxin is not necessarily as toxic to other animals as it is to humans, and puffers are eaten routinely by some species of ...


2

I only found this two references, but these are only secondary sources at the moment. Look here "Clown Fish Anemone" and here "Choosing Clownfish and Anemones for Your Aquarium". It seems that there are only around two handful of anemones capable of supporting clownfish. Here are some primary sources which confirm the 10 anemone species: "The anemonefish ...


2

I contacted Richard Pillans, the primary author of the article linked to in the question. He told me that he did not know whether the rectal gland was reduced. Researchers are hesitant to capture and dissect the freshwater sharks because of their endangered status.   He did tell me that they have gathered much more data on the movement of the sharks since ...


2

Yes, at least some fishes have intrinsic lifespans and deaths that are related to their own life-history and not to external forces such as predation or disease. Fishes show three types of senescence. Lampreys, eels and pacific salmon exhibit rapid senescence and sudden death at first spawning. The guppy, red panchax, medaka, platyfish, Indian murrel ...


2

Indeed tuna are present in the Baltic sea, and they can also grow in the Pacific and Indian oceans. A lot of the tuna we see in tuna cans in supermarkets comes from the stocks in the Indian ocean, but it is possible to have fresh tuna from the Baltic. Sorry, I only found a French answer from a famous French news paper: ...


2

Be glad to answer your questions. fish also sounds. The difference is that they are put in different positions by the body to sound.The sound of fish is about 20HZ. Difficult to discern the human ear. But you can rely on instruments to imitate and perceived. Of course, some fish also relies purely on action to exchange summarize a sound.Some fish by ...


1

Perhaps it has something to do with fish slime coats. Fish are covered in a thin layer of mucus which helps with immune system function, etc. According to these guys at least, who admittedly are not exactly a scientific authority. Perhaps grooming as a social behavior would disturb the slime coat more often than it would help remove parasites? Or it's ...


1

Something from my imagination: Probably the first fishes were of small size with some of them evolving to be big. The variation in the sizes of the fishes is larger compared to the variation in the sizes of mammals(picture elephants and rats with whales and tiny fish). That being said, if you'd have bank of small fish staying in one place and all grooming ...


1

Two things to add the the answer from @Chris. We are used to the idea that fish extract oxygen from water using gills. When such a fish is transferred into air we imagine that it can no longer breathe. However fish do in fact obtain a significant proportion of their oxygen through their skin. Furthermore, as long as the gills remain moist it should be ...


1

I have been trying to find an answer to this question, but until now, no one seems to have really analyzed why this is possible. The only hint I found comes from this paper: A study of the distribution, habitat, behaviour, venom apparatus and venom of the stonefish. They state: At periods of low water, stone-fish are often left partially exposed by ...


1

Since I can't actually look at and handle the yellow structures, it is difficult for me to provide any information on them. As far as the white structures you mention on the first picture, I believe those are most likely muscles. As for your third question. That does appear to be all one structure; and yes, going on that assumption, the entire structure ...


1

When we talk about "artificial intelligence" we are talking about the ability to solve problems not directly specified in the code. It doesn't need to have "intention" or "conscience", as @shigeta suggests. So, I'd say swarms are intelligent, it's just another "hardware" where intelligence appears. Like shigeta said, our own mind is not different in essence ...


1

Sockeye salmon species definitely do, although admittedly the interesting salmon are those that spend significant time in the ocean. Here's some evidence that carp can. Raindbow trout are also capable. Zebrafish are also able. Japanese eels too, of which some are freshwater.


1

If by 'fishery' you mean "amount of fish caught", the answer is a qualified no. Sweden's catch has been stable or perhaps slightly increasing since a low in 2005, but the catch is still much lower than a decade ago (Statistics Sweden). This is presumably due in large part to the quotas set on Total Allowable Catch for various sea regions. If by 'fishery' ...


1

I just spoke with my histological colleague about your question. He said that you should be fine for gross examination but not for microscopy. Why? He says, "When working with specimens, the higher resolution microscopy you try to achieve, the more 'potent' the fixative needs to be. A preservative will preserve what tissues are there. However, fixatives ...



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible