network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 37 | |
| visits | member for | 11 months |
| seen | May 10 at 4:52 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
|
Jun 28 |
comment |
Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? using that premise you can link pretty much anything you want, for instance if high testosterone causes that men have more sex than usual would that mean that sex causes cancer? |
|
Jun 28 |
comment |
Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? the article actually talks about the level of testosterone, baldness is consequence of high testosterone but the baldness itself holds no correlation with cancer |
|
Jun 25 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Jun 25 |
accepted | Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? fish never grow hair, they don't get bald within their lifespan I don't see any correlation between a fish and my question. |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? +1 nice and full explanation |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? I voted up man, must be someone else |
|
Jun 22 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jun 22 |
comment |
Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? +1 The fact about africans having less tendecy to baldness is interesting |
|
Jun 21 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jun 21 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Jun 21 |
asked | Shouldn't evolution have taken care of baldness already? |
