network profile
| bio | website | trending.us |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | Aug 19 '12 at 21:28 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Aug 19 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 19 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Aug 19 |
accepted | Why did life not evolve to use radio? |
|
Aug 18 |
comment |
Why did life not evolve to use radio? Thanks for the info about mormyrids and gymnotids. I'll do some further reading on them. I am only interested in biologically-generated radio communication, which was where my question was directed. One of the key differences between technology and biology is that the former is not inherently inheritable. A flock of birds that communicate via radio will pass that ability to their young and is innate. Human speech capability is passed innately to our young. The knowledge to build technology is sociological, not biological. |
|
Aug 16 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Aug 15 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 15 |
asked | Why did life not evolve to use radio? |
