Skip to main content

Timeline for Why don't viruses cause wounds?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 15, 2021 at 11:56 history edited terdon CC BY-SA 4.0
added 12 characters in body
Nov 14, 2021 at 22:10 history edited Patrick Artner CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Nov 14, 2021 at 21:34 comment added Pete Kirkham @PatrickArtner I can't edit to make that correction (30um² area rather than the currently 30um) to your answer as it's only one character
Nov 14, 2021 at 9:26 history edited Patrick Artner CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Nov 14, 2021 at 7:51 comment added Peter Mortensen ("losing" (not loosing - near "The danger".)
Nov 13, 2021 at 23:14 comment added Pete Kirkham (1mm)²/(30μm)² = 1,111 not 33,333 are you assuming that the skin cells are 30μm by 1μm? (I mean, they aren't going to be square either, but they presumably aren't that narrow)
Nov 13, 2021 at 19:27 history edited MattDMo CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Nov 13, 2021 at 14:29 history edited Patrick Artner CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 39 characters in body
Nov 13, 2021 at 14:23 comment added wimi Those huge numbers have no meaning for exponentially multiplying things like viruses...
Nov 13, 2021 at 11:08 comment added Richard Tingle I'm not sure this really addresses the thrust of the question. I interpret it as; "a virus that initially infects the nose can do enough damage to kill you. How can that much damage occur without the initial site of the infection being totally destroyed." (The answer really being that viruses don't fully conquer one area before moving on but cause small amounts of damage all over the place)
S Nov 13, 2021 at 10:46 review First answers
Nov 13, 2021 at 13:32
S Nov 13, 2021 at 10:46 history answered Patrick Artner CC BY-SA 4.0