Timeline for Why don't viruses cause wounds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 15, 2021 at 11:56 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
Nov 14, 2021 at 22:10 | history | edited | Patrick Artner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Nov 14, 2021 at 21:34 | comment | added | Pete Kirkham | @PatrickArtner I can't edit to make that correction (30um² area rather than the currently 30um) to your answer as it's only one character | |
Nov 14, 2021 at 9:26 | history | edited | Patrick Artner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Nov 14, 2021 at 7:51 | comment | added | Peter Mortensen | ("losing" (not loosing - near "The danger".) | |
Nov 13, 2021 at 23:14 | comment | added | Pete Kirkham | (1mm)²/(30μm)² = 1,111 not 33,333 are you assuming that the skin cells are 30μm by 1μm? (I mean, they aren't going to be square either, but they presumably aren't that narrow) | |
Nov 13, 2021 at 19:27 | history | edited | MattDMo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Nov 13, 2021 at 14:29 | history | edited | Patrick Artner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 39 characters in body
|
Nov 13, 2021 at 14:23 | comment | added | wimi | Those huge numbers have no meaning for exponentially multiplying things like viruses... | |
Nov 13, 2021 at 11:08 | comment | added | Richard Tingle | I'm not sure this really addresses the thrust of the question. I interpret it as; "a virus that initially infects the nose can do enough damage to kill you. How can that much damage occur without the initial site of the infection being totally destroyed." (The answer really being that viruses don't fully conquer one area before moving on but cause small amounts of damage all over the place) | |
S Nov 13, 2021 at 10:46 | review | First answers | |||
Nov 13, 2021 at 13:32 | |||||
S Nov 13, 2021 at 10:46 | history | answered | Patrick Artner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |