Timeline for How are sewage, sludge and wastewater natural environments?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18 at 14:47 | comment | added | Freezing Soul | I meant that I want to know what is the definition of "Natural" in these texts or similar ones. | |
| Aug 18 at 14:35 | comment | added | Freezing Soul | Maybe my answer probably works for a non popular definition. I still need to know where did the popular/universal/global/present definition came from. | |
| Aug 18 at 14:18 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | I wouldn't consider it as deep as that. "Natural" does not have intrinsic meaning. It's a human concept, we can choose to use the word for any grouping of things that we want; to be useful in science, it would be necessary to clearly define it for a given purpose, but it need not always have the same meaning. It's fallacious to reason backwards and derive meaning based on a label without an accompanying definition. | |
| Aug 18 at 13:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 2 at 3:07 | |||||
| Aug 18 at 11:56 | answer | added | Freezing Soul | timeline score: -1 | |
| Aug 18 at 11:35 | comment | added | Freezing Soul | The human animal involvement and The civilized man involvement? | |
| Aug 18 at 11:33 | comment | added | Freezing Soul | Maybe there is some type of human involvement that is natural and the answer maybe lies in what human action is natural and what's not? | |
| Aug 17 at 21:28 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | They're "natural" as in not, say, cultured. They're listing places in the world you'd find the species without artificially putting it there. That's it. They're not making some grand statement about human involvement more broadly. I think that's what you're getting at or assuming? | |
| Aug 17 at 18:28 | history | edited | Freezing Soul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Aug 17 at 18:19 | history | asked | Freezing Soul | CC BY-SA 4.0 |