Skip to main content
deleted 56 characters in body
Source Link
RayOfHope
  • 557
  • 2
  • 8

I could be wrong, but it seems like blue veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than red blood vessels and arteries. And I'm also wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood from less damaged blood vessels than removing already depleted blood, since in the event of an injury, bleeding would cause depleted blood to leak out that simply bleeds anyway andout due to the inner blood vessels are less disruptedinjury. Or

Or, if this is simply a trick of the color, that blue veins are just dramatically more noticeable and the first hypothesis is completely wrong.

I could be wrong, but it seems like blue veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than arteries. And I'm also wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood than removing already depleted blood, since in the event of an injury, bleeding would cause depleted blood to leak out anyway and the inner blood vessels are less disrupted. Or, if this is simply a trick of the color, that blue veins are just dramatically more noticeable.

I could be wrong, but it seems like blue veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than red blood vessels and arteries. And I'm also wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood from less damaged blood vessels than removing already depleted blood that simply bleeds anyway out due to the injury.

Or, if this is simply a trick of the color, that blue veins are just dramatically more noticeable and the first hypothesis is completely wrong.

edited title
Source Link
RayOfHope
  • 557
  • 2
  • 8

Why do depleted blood veins seem to appear near the surface of(or skin) more frequently than blood vessels and arteries?

I could be wrong, but it seems like majorblue veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than arteries. And I'm also wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood than removing already depleted blood, since in the event of an injury, bleeding would cause depleted blood to leak out anyway and the inner blood vessels are less disrupted. Or, if this is simply a trick of the color, that blue veins are just dramatically more noticeable.

Why do depleted veins seem to near the surface of skin more frequently than blood vessels and arteries?

I could be wrong, but it seems like major veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than arteries. I'm wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood than removing already depleted blood, since in the event of an injury, bleeding would cause depleted blood to leak out anyway.

Why do depleted blood veins seem to appear near the surface (or skin) more frequently than blood vessels and arteries?

I could be wrong, but it seems like blue veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than arteries. And I'm also wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood than removing already depleted blood, since in the event of an injury, bleeding would cause depleted blood to leak out anyway and the inner blood vessels are less disrupted. Or, if this is simply a trick of the color, that blue veins are just dramatically more noticeable.

Source Link
RayOfHope
  • 557
  • 2
  • 8

Why do depleted veins seem to near the surface of skin more frequently than blood vessels and arteries?

I could be wrong, but it seems like major veins generally exist closer to the surface of the body rather than arteries. I'm wondering if this is evolutionary because during an injury, the outside gets damaged first, and I am just speculating that it's more important for muscle tissue to keep gaining blood than removing already depleted blood, since in the event of an injury, bleeding would cause depleted blood to leak out anyway.