Timeline for How do we know that mild forms of rabies are nonexistent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 2, 2020 at 14:04 | history | suggested | CJ Dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improve spelling
|
| Jan 2, 2020 at 9:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 2, 2020 at 14:04 | |||||
| Dec 16, 2018 at 18:03 | history | edited | De Novo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2018 at 6:46 | history | edited | De Novo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2018 at 6:40 | comment | added | De Novo | @iayork fascinating read. Thank you for that! | |
| Dec 15, 2018 at 2:11 | comment | added | iayork | Evidence of Rabies Virus Exposure among Humans in the Peruvian Amazon found serological evidence of rabies exposure in people repeatedly exposed to vampire bats; other papers have found rare seropositive individuals among cavers and raccoon hunters, etc. However, that's not evidence of infection (could be exposure to inactivated rabies antigen floating in the air) or for that matter to rabies (could be a related lyssavirus with lower virulence, especially with the Peruvians and cavers). | |
| Dec 15, 2018 at 1:04 | history | answered | De Novo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |