Timeline for Why can't bacteriophages survive inside the human body thus negating the possibility of using them against bacteria?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2019 at 15:14 | comment | added | Amrita Mallick | Well the book actually wrote sustain, yes English is not my native language but I'm not blind. | |
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:25 | comment | added | David | It would be better to quote from the book verbatim, especially as English is not your native language. The misuse of the word "sustain" is critical here. I have edited it out, but it would be better to know what exactly was written. | |
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:23 | history | edited | David | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
English.
|
Jan 11, 2019 at 12:40 | history | edited | WYSIWYG | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Jan 10, 2019 at 15:23 | vote | accept | Amrita Mallick | ||
Jan 10, 2019 at 15:21 | history | edited | Amrita Mallick | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 117 characters in body; edited tags
|
Jan 10, 2019 at 14:07 | comment | added | Frieke | I think it's about a claim, that bacteriophages cannot survive in the human body and can therefore not be used as a treatment against bacterial infections. The question is fine, but it would be good to give the source of such claims. You say, you have done a lot of research. Showing your sources would help understanding the question. | |
Jan 10, 2019 at 14:03 | answer | added | Frieke | timeline score: 4 | |
Jan 9, 2019 at 17:55 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 10, 2019 at 21:38 | |||||
Jan 9, 2019 at 17:52 | history | asked | Amrita Mallick | CC BY-SA 4.0 |