I'm looking for an example of bacteria that could receive ultrasound (at any ultrasound frequency) signal and possibly perform some (re)action afterwards.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ ... well it can break open the cells and kills them ... $\endgroup$
    – shigeta
    Sep 7 '13 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ I know but maybe there is some ultrasound frequency that doesn't kill bacteria. $\endgroup$
    – syntagma
    Sep 7 '13 at 17:47
  • $\begingroup$ I'm having a hard time thinking of any natural phenomena that produce ultrasound in which the bacteria could then transduce. If the frequency is not immediately lethal, I worry the heat transfer could be. $\endgroup$
    – user560
    Sep 7 '13 at 18:14

I'm going to post a quick answer here, really a thought piece.

Usually to detect a sound wave you need a sounding board about the wavelength of the sound.

Bacteria are on the order of a few microns in length.

Ultrasound frequencies range from 2 to 200 MHz (and up I assume).

To have a wavelength on the order of 3 microns, a 100 MHz wave would be needed.

So only on the very high end of the range. If bacteria make sound though, they probably are on this frequency range.

I wonder if this has been looked at? Not sure it has. While in biology you never say never - if a bacterium really needs to pick up a wave it might have a clever adaptation to do so, but in the 100MHz + frequency range seems more likely.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.