In Pnueli et al., 2015, they knock down an enhancer RNA using RNAi, testing whether it is a mere byproduct or whether it has a key role in the enhancer's function. They find their system works: the siRNA knocks down the enhancer RNA that it's targeted to, enabling further study. Hooray!

... but I've read that RNAi and the RISC work outside the nucleus, and intra-nuclear effects are further downstream and indirect (example: Gosline et al. assume that effects on introns are indirect). I assume the paper's not wrong, so what's going on?

  • Conventional wisdom is wrong or incomplete: RNAi can work inside the nucleus too.
  • Pneuli et al.'s enhancer RNA gets exported to the cytoplasm and then re-imported to act on its target gene.
  • Something else?

Pnueli, L., Rudnizky, S., Yosefzon, Y., & Melamed, P. (2015). RNA transcribed from a distal enhancer is required for activating the chromatin at the promoter of the gonadotropin α-subunit gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(14), 4369-4374.

Gosline, S. J., Gurtan, A. M., JnBaptiste, C. K., Bosson, A., Milani, P., Dalin, S., ... & Fraenkel, E. (2016). Elucidating microRNA regulatory networks using transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and histone modification measurements. Cell reports, 14(2), 310-319.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Are you sure an antisense RNA against this enhancer RNA uses the cell’s microRNA RISC system? I don’t know, but a priori would expect not. $\endgroup$
    – David
    Sep 5, 2021 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ I have no idea. What else would it use? $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2021 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ Hybridization? When antisense RNA was first introduced the microRNA Dicer system was unknown, and the strategy was based on the idea of inactivating mRNAs by hybridization. The reason I would not expect such antisense RNAs to use the Dicer system is that they do not have the imperfect stem-loop structure of the natural substrate. I may be wrong as this is not a technique I have used, but you should check it out before assuming your assumption is correct and there is a problem with the paper $\endgroup$
    – David
    Sep 5, 2021 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ Would hybridization lower concentration of the target RNA as measured by e.g. qPCR? Or would it affect activity without altering concentration? $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2021 at 19:46
  • $\begingroup$ FWIW, the system they describe using is shRNA, which I thought worked via RNAi. That's what wikipedia says anyway. If it's more complicated than that, well, that's basically my question. $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2021 at 19:47

1 Answer 1


RNAi can happen in the nucleus as well. This is better documented in C.elegans but there are some references supporting nuclear RNAi in mammalian cells too:

  1. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707440114
  2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.013
  3. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1305

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.