I was surprised to see how far apart macadamia and hazelnuts are from each other. I always thought all trees had a common ancestor that was also a tree. But that doesn't seem to be the case? Did wood evolve multiple times?
-
3$\begingroup$ Welcome to Biology.SE. You seem to be assuming that the first flowering plant wasn't a woody plant. IIRC at least one hypothesis about the origin of angiosperms contradicts this assumption. Wikipedia looks like a reasonable place to start checking what the latest thinking on this is, but if that is correct then herbaceous angiosperms have lost "treeness". Also, please edit your title — it doesn't seem to reflect your actual question because trees occur outside the angiosperms! $\endgroup$– tyersomeSep 25, 2021 at 0:38
-
$\begingroup$ WRT evolving multiple times, consider bamboo, which is botanically a grass, even though some varieties can be tree-sized, and the stems are to all appearances a kind of wood. $\endgroup$– jamesqfSep 25, 2021 at 4:15
1 Answer
The word "tree" is a not a taxonomic classification, but a human perceptual clustering based on form and size. The word "fish" has a similar problem, covering a vast collection of taxa, some of which are less closely related to one another than they are to us.
Becoming tree-like often has a strong evolutionary value, because plants compete for sunlight and taller plants shade shorter plants. Thus, we should not be surprised that "tree" forms have evolved independently in a number of different lineages.
The common evolutionary lineage for all of these, however, is tracheophyta, the vascular plants. These are plants that have differentiated xylem (which is the wood of a tree) and phloem tissues for transport of water and minerals. Most such plants are not trees, of course, but these tissues provide an effective means of vertical transport and the basis for hard woody material, which appears to have been the key differentiator between plants capable of evolving into trees and plants that are not able do to so.