2
$\begingroup$

Intuitively, I would expect that an organism that has lived in the ocean for millions of years and can breathe underwater should outcompete any newcomer that is not fully adapted for oceanic life. It makes sense that there may be some semiaquatic animals that can outcompete fish in semiaquatic niches, such as seals, crocodiles, and diving birds. And I could see there being short-term instances of odd species that manage to colonize an isolated area that happens to lack competition.

But dolphins and whales are extremely successful across the globe, have been around for millions of years, and a large part of their niche overlaps with the much older and also hugely successful sharks, yet they manage just fine. A common explanation of this is "intelligence" but sharks are now known to be pretty intelligent, and even if they weren't, why wouldn't they be?

This isn't the first time this has happened, either. Aquatic reptiles like ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and mosasaurs, and even modern sea turtles, represent hugely prolific and long-lasting groups of air-breathing, fully-aquatic animals (sea turtles come on land to lay eggs, but this seems more like a flaw than an advantage), suggesting that there is something in particular about land-dwelling that gives animals returning to the sea a natural advantage not found in their piscine counterparts.

Is there anything specific about evolving on land - some particular trait that doesn't generally evolve in aquatic animals - that cetaceans retained after returning to the sea, and that makes them particularly successful in the aquatic lifestyle?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do sharks show evidence of great social intelligence? $\endgroup$ Oct 8 '21 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ @ARogueAnt. It's not as well studied as cetaceans, but numerous studies suggest the answer is yes wired.com/2016/11/… smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/… sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161004224218.htm $\endgroup$ Oct 8 '21 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ @ARogueAnt. At any rate, it wouldn't answer the question - if you would say "their intelligence or social behavior," the question simply becomes "why are air-breathers more likely to be intelligent or social than water-breathers". $\endgroup$ Oct 8 '21 at 15:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd consider biology.stackexchange.com/questions/35532/… both on its own and as a partial answer to those questions ("why are air-breathers more likely to be intelligent or social than water-breathers") as well as in conjunction with the answer by timeskull. Natural selection operates on variability that exists; not every possible trait is expressed in a way that can be selected for in every lineage. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Oct 8 '21 at 20:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You seem to missing the effect of phylogeny. Cetaceans are mammals — their advantages don't necessarily have a direct connection to them having terrestrial ancestors, but instead are likely to be because they are mammals. Please also note that what makes aquatic reptiles successful may have nothing to do with cetaceans, so I would avoid lumping them together in one question. $\endgroup$
    – tyersome
    Oct 8 '21 at 23:54
5
$\begingroup$

Thermoregulation and echolocation both depend on evolutions that occurred on land and seem to be less accessible to fish than to the ancestors of mammals. The heat capacity of water is much greater than air, so maintaining an elevated temperature in body tissues is both more difficult and less necessary. Still, some fish lineages have independently evolved partial thermoregulation. From the article Warm eyes provide superior vision in swordfishes:

In these animals, warming the central nervous system and the eyes is the one common feature of this energetically costly adaptation. In the swordfish (Xiphias gladius), a highly specialized heating system located in an extraocular muscle specifically warms the eyes and brain up to 10 degrees C-15 degrees C above ambient water temperatures.

Depending on diving depth, temporal resolution can be more than ten times greater in these fishes than in fishes with eyes at the same temperature as the surrounding water. The enhanced temporal resolution allowed by heated eyes provides warm-blooded and highly visual oceanic predators, such as swordfishes, tunas, and sharks, with a crucial advantage over their agile, cold-blooded prey.

Echolocation in mammals is possible due to the mammalian ear, which is summarized in a previous answer. From Ultrasonic hearing and echolocation in the earliest toothed whales:

The advent of echolocation is thought to be a key innovation that supported exploitation of a vast pelagic biomass—vertically migrating organisms, especially cephalopods—and explosive diversification of odontocetes

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Advantages of air breathing over gills? Keeping in mind water-breathing animals could still evolve lungs.

Not being vulnerable to parasites and diseases of the gills, which are obliged to have blood supply close to the water.

Able to colonise water regardless of salinity, able to survive warm water.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Should I answer if I don’t “have citations from a reputable source”? $\endgroup$ Oct 17 '21 at 6:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.