So, I can see that there's a couple of questions touching on this subject already, but none of them answer the aspect that I'm curious about:

Dietary fiber is a polymer composed of multiple starch molecules chained together, and starch molecules are polymers composed of multiple sugar molecules chained together, right?

So, why are our bodies are able to digest starches and not dietary fiber, when the process for digesting starches involves breaking up the starch polymers into sugar molecules? Why can't the same enzymes used to break down starches break dietary fiber down into its component starch molecules, or break individual sugar molecules off of the ends of them?

Is it simply a matter of time, and we simply pass put the partially-digested remains of the dietary fiber because it doesn't remain in our gut long enough to properly digest? I know that cows have multiple stomachs to facilitate the digestion of grass, but I also know that they've got symbiotic bacteria helping them out as well.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are mistaken about dietary fiber — please read the linked wikipedia page and edit or delete your post according to whether you still have a question. $\endgroup$
    – tyersome
    Nov 4, 2021 at 0:07
  • $\begingroup$ @tyersome Huh, it looks like there's more than one kind of dietary fiber. TIL. I think I'm asking about cellulose specifically, then. $\endgroup$
    – nick012000
    Nov 4, 2021 at 0:12
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Then I suggest you read up on what cellulose is — it is not starch (the bonds between glucose units are different). $\endgroup$
    – tyersome
    Nov 4, 2021 at 0:22
  • $\begingroup$ @tyersome If the correct answer is something like "starches are held together with A bonds, dietary fibers are held together with B bonds, and the enzymes only work to break A bonds for X reason", I'd be happy to accept that answer. $\endgroup$
    – nick012000
    Nov 4, 2021 at 3:14
  • $\begingroup$ How much organic chemistry do you know? This is ultimately a question about glycosidic bonds ... and since dietary fiber isn't one thing so there is no general answer, which means you need to focus your question. $\endgroup$
    – tyersome
    Nov 4, 2021 at 4:22

1 Answer 1


"starches are held together with A bonds, dietary fibers are held together with B bonds, and the enzymes only work to break A bonds for X reason"

What you wrote here is correct. A is primarily an α(1,4)-glycosidic bond and B in cellulose is primarily a β(1,4)-glycosidic bond.

alpha vs. beta glucosidic bonds, comparing maltose and cellobiose

From Chemistry of Life at abpischools.org.uk

Maltose is one of the disaccharides produced when starches are broken down, while cellobiose is a disaccharide from cellulose.

Alpha bonds are broken during digestion of starches by the enzyme known as α-amylase, in particular one that specializes in breaking α-(1,4) bonds (there are other alpha bonds, like α-(1,2), as well). Humans express a number of α-amylases. However, β-(1,4)-amylase is only expressed in bacteria, fungi, and plants. Even cows and other grass-eating animals can't digest cellulose on their own – they have massive colonies of bacteria in their digestive systems to do it for them.

The reason α-amylases can't break β bonds is that the two different molecules have rather different chemical "shapes", even though the structures look very similar in the flat drawing above. You may have heard that enzymes work by a sort of "lock and key" model. The substrate (the thing being chemically altered by the enzyme) fits into a specifically-shaped binding pocket surrounding the active site on the enzyme, just like a key fitting into a lock. If the key is the wrong shape, sometimes even by just a little bit, it won't fit properly and won't open the lock. In the same way, if a potential substrate doesn't have the correct chemical "shape", it won't fit into the binding pocket of the enzyme and be acted upon.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .