2
$\begingroup$

I've been looking at some journals lately that look at carbon emission from lakes where some lakes act as sources and other act as sinks. The paper that I have been looking at is

http://www3.nd.edu/~underc/east/publications/documents/Cole_94Science.pdf

where they show that lakes are sources of CO2 to the atmosphere. What are the equations that are used to determine the saturation of CO2 in surface waters?

The recent IPCC report also mentions that lakes act as sources of CO2 but does not give any indication of the equations used to come up with these values. Presumably, to determine the concentration of carbon in the surface water you need to use other measured variables such as temperature. Can anyone suggest a method for estimating this concentration ?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I imagine this would get a better response on the chemistry SE $\endgroup$ – rg255 Dec 1 '13 at 8:31
  • $\begingroup$ Paragraph 2 describes their methods in detail. If I have time I can outline it, but it might not be today... i think this is a fair biology/ecology question. These days a fair number of biologists need to know their environmental/bio chemistry $\endgroup$ – shigeta Dec 1 '13 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ second paragraph reads: Data were obtained from the literature and direct measurements. The value for PCO2 was calculated from ph and DIC or ANC with corrections for other variables. I am looking for the equation used for calculating PCO2 from these variables. $\endgroup$ – KatyB Dec 1 '13 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ I agree with @shigeta this is still a biology question (I recommend asking on both biology and chemistry SE) $\endgroup$ – rg255 Dec 3 '13 at 9:47
1
$\begingroup$

Take a look at Paragraph 2.

I'll outline it in more or less plain english (I hope).

for 37 lakes they used this method:

1) they took a sample of water from 0.1 to 0.25 m below the surface. Using a thermos bottle. This would minimize change of the gas composition of the water with a change of temperature. The bottle was not sealed, but left out for a while in the air there at the lake (it was "equilibrated with ambient air"). If you were looking for issues you might or might not like this.

2) a sample of air 1m above the lake was taken.

3) they got a gas chromatograph to measure the CO2 in the air above the water sample, as well as in the air from above the lake. They might have taken the readings right there at the sampling point, or not its not clear. They may have also sealed bottles up and taken them to the lab. It sort of sounds like a point of sample measurement.

If the air above the water samples had more CO2 than the air above the lake, they called the water supersaturated as the water was emitting CO2.

This method does its best to simplify the question of whether fresh water bodies are saturated with CO2 and emitting it or if they might be absorbing it. By not outgassing the CO2 in the water and trying to get an absolute content of CO2, they are able to get around the various organisms and minerals in the water and pH which would vary the amount of CO2 the lakes can hold. they are just focusing on whether the water is giving off CO2.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.