Which animal/plant/anything has smallest length genome?


Since you said plant/animal/anything, I offer the smallest genomes in various categories...

(Kb means Kilobases, Mb means Megabases. 1 Kb = 1000 base pairs, 1Mb = 1000Kb)


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well done! How did you find these? $\endgroup$ – user560 Mar 12 '12 at 16:36
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ The plant and bacterial ones I had floating around in my memory having read about them previously, so a bit of googling confirmed the names. The animal ones I got from the Animal Genome Size DB, and from Wikipedia. I guessed that viral genomes would be the smallest, so I also searched for the smallest viral genome. Then I went back to the literature (by searching Google Scholar for organism name + "genome size") to check all my facts and provide reliable references. $\endgroup$ – Rik Smith-Unna Mar 12 '12 at 18:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice answer Richard. $\endgroup$ – Poshpaws Mar 13 '12 at 11:38

I want to say Mycoplasma genitalium with a genome size of 582,970 bp. Turns out the answer is Nanoarchaeum eqitans with a genome of 490,885 bp.



  • 5
    $\begingroup$ That's the smallest genome of a free-living organism. And until 2003 you would have been right about Mycoplasma, which were previously the smallest known in that category. $\endgroup$ – Rik Smith-Unna Mar 12 '12 at 0:38

Both Mycoplasma genitalium and Nanoarchaeum equitans are obligate parasites / endosymbionts. This means that they depend heavily on their host to support their vital functions and they have lost many of their own genes.

A really free-living organism with an extremely small genome (~1309 kbp, 1354 genes) is the heterotrophic marine alpha-proteobacterium Pelagibacter ubique [1].

See a larger analysis here: https://alamot.github.io/smallest_genome/

[1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16109880 Giovannoni SJ, Tripp HJ, Givan S, Podar M, Vergin KL, et al. (2005). «Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium». Science 309: 1242–1245.


Smallest free-living bacterial genome: Nanoarchaeum eqitans at 491Kb (Waters et al., 2003) I downloaded this paper it says that this is archaea and its obligate symbiont not a free living bacteria. Please read carefully and then upload it.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you please edit your answer and add a link for the reference? $\endgroup$ – Chris Aug 14 '15 at 10:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.