1
$\begingroup$

I read "not for diagnostic use" in every protocol i saw. why is it so? which differences have the kits and material that are used for diagnostic purposes?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

the FDA has to approve diagnostics - a rigorous and expensive process. Its a legal distinction, but also one which conveys a significant level of usefulness and reliability.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The quality controls (GMP, GLP and so on) which have to be implemented for diagnostic kits are also ways more complicated, what makes these kits more expensive. $\endgroup$
    – Chris ♦
    Dec 19 '13 at 15:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes definitely - it takes years and $millions usually. and its effectiveness has to be clear and reproducible. $\endgroup$
    – shigeta
    Dec 19 '13 at 18:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.