Why can fish breathe under water but land mammals can't? How can fish extract oxygen straight from water but humans can't?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's always helpful to other users if you show what you have found on the matter so far so that any input is a constructive one. $\endgroup$ – Bez May 25 '14 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ shortly speaking. Because they have gills! You may want to have a look to the wiki article for fish gills. You may also want to google "How do fish gills work?". I think you will easily find all the information by yourself. Note: You say that land mammals can't breath underwater. Neither do the aquatic mammals. All aquatic mammals have lung and therefore need to come back to the surface to breath. $\endgroup$ – Remi.b May 25 '14 at 17:02
  • $\begingroup$ I believe that terrestrial animals tend to consume far more oxygen as well, so that even if a land animal had lots of gills, it could still not survive underwater. $\endgroup$ – Superbest May 25 '14 at 21:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Superbest - I would imagine that great white sharks consume a lot of oxygen when they're hunting, and last time I saw one it was just slightly larger than I am :) $\endgroup$ – MattDMo May 26 '14 at 3:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ isn't this just a matter of a small Google search.. $\endgroup$ – The Last Word May 26 '14 at 4:29

I'm taking this question at face value. Yes, fish have gills, but we also have a respiratory surface in our lungs so why couldn't we 'breathe' water and extract the oxygen (since extraction is a simple matter of diffusion from the content of the lungs into the blood).

Apparently we use 550 L of pure O2 per day. This works out as approximately 400 g.

The solubility of O2 in fresh water is around 10 mg L-1. Assuming a hypothetical situation where we could breathe water and extract all of the O2 from each lungful this means that we would need to breathe 28 L of water per minute, compared to the 8 L of air that we breathe.

Now of course water has a much higher density than air so that a lot of energy would be expended in moving this much water in and out of the lungs (which in turn would require us to consume more oxygen). Couple this with the fact that realistically we would only be able to use a fraction of the O2 dissolved in each lungful and you can begin to see why this is a non-starter.

Gills allow this problem to be largely circumvented by having a one way flow of water over the respiratory surface, which in the case of fish is often achieved at least in part by moving through the water.

  • $\begingroup$ +1 good answer. Note also that because water is more viscous than air, fish can have thiner structures than terrestrial organisms allowing a greater surface exchange. $\endgroup$ – Remi.b May 27 '14 at 17:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.